Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5598
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5598
29 Sep 2026
 | 29 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Extreme high-water anomalies in southwest coastal Bangladesh: model uncertainty, cyclone-event checks and non-stationarity

Sujoy Biswas, M. Shahjahan Ali, Arpon Roy, Nikhil Ronjon Roy, and Juganto Roy

Abstract. Extreme high-water estimates are needed for coastal flood-risk assessment and infrastructure design, but short, incomplete and strongly seasonal tidal-river records make them difficult to constrain. We analysed daily maximum water levels through 2025 at five Bangladesh Water Development Board stations in southwest coastal Bangladesh using a station-specific leave-one-year-out Monthly Climatological High-Water Reference (MCHR) derived from monthly means of daily maxima. Annual maxima were modelled with Normal, Gumbel-I and generalized extreme-value distributions fitted by L-moments (GEV-LM), while declustered peaks over threshold were analysed with a generalized Pareto distribution (POT-GPD). After 90 % annual completeness screening, 25–34 annual maxima remained per station. At the 100-year return period, the four stationary approaches differed by 15.6–21.5 %. POT estimates were stable across threshold and declustering choices at four stations, whereas SW244 showed an 18.75 % maximum deviation from its baseline estimate. Combined trend, change-point and likelihood evidence supported time-varying GEV location at four stations after false-discovery-rate adjustment and trend-free prewhitening sensitivity; likelihood evidence remained significant at all four, while SW243 remained stationary. Replacing the mean MCHR with a median reference changed 100-year GEV-LM and POT-GPD estimates by at most 2.79 % and 3.48 %, respectively. Cyclone-date checks showed that Aila, Amphan, Yaas and Remal coincided with annual maxima or unusually high anomalies at multiple stations. Extreme high-water estimates from short tidal-river records are most informative when model choice, sampling, non-stationarity, parameter uncertainty and data quality are reported alongside the point estimate instead of being collapsed into a single deterministic return level.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sujoy Biswas, M. Shahjahan Ali, Arpon Roy, Nikhil Ronjon Roy, and Juganto Roy

Status: open (until 10 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sujoy Biswas, M. Shahjahan Ali, Arpon Roy, Nikhil Ronjon Roy, and Juganto Roy
Sujoy Biswas, M. Shahjahan Ali, Arpon Roy, Nikhil Ronjon Roy, and Juganto Roy
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 29 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
Using daily maximum water levels from five stations in southwest coastal Bangladesh, this study compares methods for estimating rare high-water events, tests whether extremes have changed over time, and checks their timing against major cyclones. The results show that estimates vary among models and locations, especially where records are short, so uncertainty and data quality should be considered in coastal hazard assessment.
Share