Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5586
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5586
01 Oct 2026
 | 01 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Fire danger and wildfire occurrence in Botswana’s savannas: evaluating fire-danger indices and early-warning thresholds using 2001–2024 observations

Kago E. Maabong, Kgakgamatso M. Mphale, Douglas Letsholathebe, Thuso H. Tlhalerwa, and Oyapo Chimidza

Abstract. Fire danger indices are important tools for operational fire management, yet their performance in African savannas remains poorly evaluated. We assessed eight widely used indices, Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC), Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI), McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI), Initial Spread Index (ISI), Drought Moisture Code (DMC), Buildup Index (BUI), Drought Code (DC), and Keetch–Byram Drought Index (KBDI) against 24 years (2001–2024) of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) derived fire occurrence data across Botswana. Index values were calculated from ERA5 Land reanalysis data and evaluated using Spearman rank correlation, logistic regression with cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and percentile-based odds ratios across annual, dry-season, and wet-season periods. Fine fuel moisture indices consistently outperformed deep drought codes. FFMC showed the strongest discrimination (AUC = 0.821; P90 OR = 9.08), followed by FFDI, FWI, and ISI, whereas DC and KBDI ranked lowest. Fire occurrence odds were approximately seven to nine times higher at or above the 90th percentile than below the threshold, with the steepest increases occurring above approximately the 70th–75th percentile range. No index was significantly correlated with seasonal fire totals (ρ < 0.22, p > 0.05), indicating that these indices are better suited to assessing daily fire danger than cumulative seasonal activity. The findings support a fire danger monitoring framework for Botswana in which FFMC serves as the primary daily indicator, supported by FFDI and FWI, with alert thresholds anchored to the 75th and 90th percentiles of a locally derived climatology.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Kago E. Maabong, Kgakgamatso M. Mphale, Douglas Letsholathebe, Thuso H. Tlhalerwa, and Oyapo Chimidza

Status: open (until 12 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Kago E. Maabong, Kgakgamatso M. Mphale, Douglas Letsholathebe, Thuso H. Tlhalerwa, and Oyapo Chimidza
Kago E. Maabong, Kgakgamatso M. Mphale, Douglas Letsholathebe, Thuso H. Tlhalerwa, and Oyapo Chimidza
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
This study tested eight weather-based measures of fire danger across Botswana using 24 years of satellite fire records. Measures reflecting the dryness of fine surface fuels were best at identifying days likely to have fires, while long-term drought measures performed poorly. Fire occurrence was about seven to nine times more likely on the highest-risk days. The findings support tailored daily fire alerts, led by the Fine Fuel Moisture Code, to improve preparedness and fire management.
Share