Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-556
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-556
17 Mar 2026
 | 17 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

A framework for evaluating ice sheet altimetry uncertainty estimates

Karla Boxall, Malcolm McMillan, Alan Muir, Sarah Appleby, Sophie Dubber, Noel Gourmelen, Clare Willis, and Joe Phillips

Abstract. For three decades, ice sheet elevation records from satellite radar altimetry have provided new insight into the state of the cryosphere and its contribution to global sea-level rise. The availability of robust, consistent and traceable uncertainties alongside ice sheet elevation data is crucial for combining measurements across missions and enabling their use in reconciling estimates of ice sheet mass balance and constraining numerical ice sheet models. At present, such uncertainties are largely absent from existing Level 2 ice sheet elevation products, and for the subset of products where uncertainties are provided, there is neither a standardised approach to uncertainty generation nor a method to evaluate their robustness. Here, we develop a novel uncertainty evaluation framework and provide a comprehensive assessment of uncertainty generation for altimetry-based ice sheet elevations. Overall, we find that calculating uncertainty as a parameterisation of topographic complexity (characterised by surface slope and roughness) and measurement quality (characterised by backscattered power and coherence) improves performance relative to solutions that use fewer co-variates. Ultimately, the framework presented here will enable the systematic characterisation of ice sheet elevation uncertainties associated with historical, current and future polar radar altimeter missions, including the Copernicus Polar Ice and Snow Topography Altimeter (CRISTAL). Such information will aid the successful combination of altimetry measurements across missions, improve the constraint of numerical ice sheet models, and enable more certain estimates of current and future ice sheet mass balance and global sea-level rise.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Karla Boxall, Malcolm McMillan, Alan Muir, Sarah Appleby, Sophie Dubber, Noel Gourmelen, Clare Willis, and Joe Phillips

Status: open (until 28 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Karla Boxall, Malcolm McMillan, Alan Muir, Sarah Appleby, Sophie Dubber, Noel Gourmelen, Clare Willis, and Joe Phillips
Karla Boxall, Malcolm McMillan, Alan Muir, Sarah Appleby, Sophie Dubber, Noel Gourmelen, Clare Willis, and Joe Phillips
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 17 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Satellite radar altimeters have measured ice sheet elevation since the 1990s, but associated uncertainty estimates are often absent or untested, despite being crucial for efforts to estimate past, present and future sea-level rise. Here, we present a new framework to generate and assess uncertainties associated with historical, current and future radar altimeters. Our results show uncertainty performance varies according to processing method, satellite and region.
Share