Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-554
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-554
11 Feb 2026
 | 11 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Impacts of mesoscale atmospheric subsidence on cloud glaciation and decoupling in Arctic marine cold air outbreaks

Fiona M. Paulus, Joshua J. Müller, Benjamin Kirbus, Harald Sodemann, Lars van Gelder, Andreas Walbröl, Manfred Wendisch, and Roel A. J. Neggers

Abstract. The impact of mesoscale vertical motion on the thermodynamic, microphysical, and convective transformations of marine cold air outbreaks (MCAOs) is still largely unknown, partly due to scarce high-resolution observations in upstream Arctic regions. Therefore, this study investigates the effects of mesoscale subsidence on the evolution of the atmospheric boundary-layer (ABL), cloud phase, and precipitation for a case study of a shallow MCAO observed in the Fram Strait in March 2022 during the HALO–(AC)3 campaign. Quasi-Lagrangian large-eddy simulations (LES) are conducted with observational initialisation and larger-scale forcing, based on airborne in-situ and remote-sensing measurements. The LES control simulation accurately reproduces the measured thermodynamic ABL structure and the temporal evolution of the observed air mass moving over the Arctic sea ice onto the open ocean. Specifically, the measured ABL height, integrated water vapour, and cloud water paths are well represented by the LES. Sensitivity experiments using the LES with prescribed subsidence reveal that weaker subsidence substantially alters the evolution of cloud phase during the MCAO, featuring a deeper ABL and an earlier onset of cloud glaciation. This study shows that ABL internal decoupling plays a key role in this process. Decoupling occurs sooner under weaker mesoscale subsidence, triggering convective graupel formation that subsequently intensively converts liquid water droplets. This strong link between glaciation and decoupling arguably explains the typical evolution of the cloud liquid water path observed in many MCAOs. These results provide a process-based framework for interpreting the role of large-scale vertical motion in Arctic air mass transformations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Fiona M. Paulus, Joshua J. Müller, Benjamin Kirbus, Harald Sodemann, Lars van Gelder, Andreas Walbröl, Manfred Wendisch, and Roel A. J. Neggers

Status: open (until 01 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Fiona M. Paulus, Joshua J. Müller, Benjamin Kirbus, Harald Sodemann, Lars van Gelder, Andreas Walbröl, Manfred Wendisch, and Roel A. J. Neggers
Fiona M. Paulus, Joshua J. Müller, Benjamin Kirbus, Harald Sodemann, Lars van Gelder, Andreas Walbröl, Manfred Wendisch, and Roel A. J. Neggers

Viewed

Total article views: 214 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
139 64 11 214 22 27
  • HTML: 139
  • PDF: 64
  • XML: 11
  • Total: 214
  • BibTeX: 22
  • EndNote: 27
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Feb 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Feb 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 213 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 213 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 03 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Cold Arctic air flowing from sea ice onto the warmer ocean waters rapidly warms, moistens, and forms clouds and precipitation. These events shape the Arctic climate but are difficult to observe and model. Particularly the role of large-scale sinking motion during these events is not fully understood. Using rare aircraft data and simulations to track an air mass for two days, we show that strong downward motion suppresses cloud growth, limits and delays precipitation, and reduces cloud lifetimes.
Share