the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Nonlinear resonance in the wave–shoreline system: mechanisms and global expression
Abstract. Shoreline variability is commonly interpreted through linear links with external forcings, yet many coastal systems display oscillatory modes whose origin cannot be traced to any single forcing frequency. Here, we show that a robust and regionally recurrent quasi-biennial (20–30 month) mode of shoreline variability emerges from a nonlinear triadic resonance between the semi-annual (≈6 month) components of wave energy and the corresponding delayed shoreline response. Using satellite-derived shoreline time series (1993–2019), a set of known environmental drivers, and an iterative cross-EOF method to remove all linear forcing contributions, we identify a persistent residual peak centered at 24–26 months that is absent from the forcing spectra themselves. This peak arises from resonance between two near semi-annual frequencies, specifically through excitation of the shoreline by semi-annual wave forcing that produces a phase-shifted (lagged) near semi-annual shoreline response. The semi-annual wave forcing originates from two mechanisms: (1) phase opposition between local wind-sea and remote swell along eastern boundary systems, and (2) asymmetric annual wind forcing in monsoonal regions and semi-enclosed basins. A global triadic phase-coupling analysis confirms that these near semi-annual components interact nonlinearly to inject energy at the difference frequency, producing the emergent ≈24-month mode, which represents, on average, 15 % of the total dataset's shoreline variance in resonance-prone regions. These results establish nonlinear resonance as a fundamental and previously overlooked mechanism shaping shoreline variability at regional scales, with implications for understanding and predicting coastal response to changes in storm seasonality and wave-climate asymmetry.
- Preprint
(6755 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 03 May 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-541', Robert Guza & Kilian Vos (co-review team), 11 Mar 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-541/egusphere-2026-541-RC1-supplement.pdfReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-541-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', marius Aparicio, 19 Mar 2026
reply
We appreciate the time and effort invested by reviewer(s) 1 in evaluating our work.
Please find attached our response to RC1.-
RC3: 'Reply on AC1', Robert Guza & Kilian Vos (co-review team), 25 Mar 2026
reply
see attached
-
RC3: 'Reply on AC1', Robert Guza & Kilian Vos (co-review team), 25 Mar 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', marius Aparicio, 19 Mar 2026
reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-541', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Mar 2026
reply
I do not find the NP journal a venue for this paper. The results are entirely dependent on the quality of the data and on data processing expertise and deep knowledge of the nearshore dynamics. The critical role played by the data in the results dictate how important and significant the outcomes of this research are. This journal and its main readers will not be able to assess the results, methods, and data presented in this paper. This referee is amply familiar with models for a variety of nearshore processes, and in this realm I can so nothing gained from their theoretical model with regard to explaining triadic interactions, which are expected in quadratic nonlinear dynamics.
This referee recommends that the authors submit this work to a more observational journal, where their results and methods will be appreciated and familiar, and the impact of their result fairly measured.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-541-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', marius Aparicio, 23 Mar 2026
reply
We appreciate the time and effort invested by reviewer 2 in evaluating our work.
Please find attached our response to RC2.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', marius Aparicio, 23 Mar 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 211 | 90 | 25 | 326 | 48 | 60 |
- HTML: 211
- PDF: 90
- XML: 25
- Total: 326
- BibTeX: 48
- EndNote: 60
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1