Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5402
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5402
12 Oct 2026
 | 12 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Automated karst spring catchment approximation for discharge modelling

Pauline Thinius, Felix Joger, Tanja Liesch, and Nico Goldscheider

Abstract. Karst spring discharge modelling is complicated by the limited availability of hydrogeologically delineated catchments, particularly in large-sample applications. We present an automated approach to approximate karst spring catchments from discharge, gridded recharge, and topography and evaluate its suitability for discharge modelling at 63 springs across the wider Alpine region. Recharge-area size is estimated from a simplified water balance and represented by a circular catchment whose position is informed by the topography. The approximations are evaluated against expert-based catchments in terms of geometry and derived model inputs and subsequently applied to discharge modelling with the lumped reservoir model KarstMod and a global long short-term memory (LSTM) network. The estimated recharge areas agree within ±50 % of the expert-based delineations for 65 % of the springs, while spatial overlap is more limited (median Intersection over Union: 0.34). Despite this imperfect geometric agreement, the approximations represent catchment-mean elevation, precipitation, and temperature more closely than extracting inputs solely at the spring location. For KarstMod, this translates into substantially improved discharge simulations: approximated and expert-based catchments both achieve a median Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) of 0.72, compared with 0.63 for the point-based representation. Differences are particularly pronounced for snow-influenced springs, where representation of catchment elevation affects temperature forcing and simulated snow accumulation and melt. The global LSTM is less sensitive to catchment representation, although greater sensitivity also emerges for snow-influenced springs. These results show that accurate reconstruction of hydrogeological catchment boundaries is not necessarily required to improve model inputs for lumped-parameter modelling. The proposed approximation does not replace expert hydrogeological delineation but provides a scalable, physically informed catchment representation for large-sample karst spring discharge modelling where such delineations are unavailable.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Pauline Thinius, Felix Joger, Tanja Liesch, and Nico Goldscheider

Status: open (until 23 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Pauline Thinius, Felix Joger, Tanja Liesch, and Nico Goldscheider

Model code and software

Catchment_approx Thinius, Pauline; Liesch, Tanja https://github.com/PaulineThinius/Catchment_approx

Pauline Thinius, Felix Joger, Tanja Liesch, and Nico Goldscheider
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 12 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Karst spring catchments are difficult to delineate because underground drainage does not necessarily follow surface topography. We developed an automated method to approximate catchments using widely available data. Applied to 63 Alpine springs, it better represents catchment characteristics than using only the spring location. The results show that catchment representation can affect discharge modelling and provide a practical alternative where expert delineations are unavailable.
Share