Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5397
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5397
21 Sep 2026
 | 21 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).

From climate projections to trajectory-conditioned local predictions

Simon L. L. Michel, Kristian Strommen, and Hannah M. Christensen

Abstract. Regional climate projections are usually sharpened by constraining models’ forced responses toward observations, a step that filters out internal variability and works well mainly where the signal-to-noise ratio is high. Here we side-step this limitation with deep learning, treating internal variability not as noise to remove but as part of the future to predict and of the uncertainty to report. A U-Net trained on 290 simulations from 40 CMIP6 Earth System Models maps the 1980 to 2025 evolution of surface air temperature onto decadal-mean monthly climatologies from the 2030s to the 2090s under SSP2-4.5, keeping the forced response and internal variability together. Tested on entirely withheld model families, the forecasts are skilful and empirically calibrated out-of-sample. Within a model's own ensemble, a forecast predicts the future of the specific member it was given more accurately than the futures of that model's other members, a skill that persists to the 2090s, notably over the subpolar North Atlantic, Europe, North America and Southern Ocean. The forecasts also generalise to a next-generation eddy-rich model whose resolved physics lies outside the training distribution, supporting application to real-world data. When applied to observations, the framework reduces uncertainty in global-mean warming similarly to observational constraints, while also providing spatially coherent local predictions. This shows that our deep learning approach can estimate the distribution of future local climate, conditioned on the recent observed trajectory, encompassing uncertainty arising from both forced response and internal variability realisations. This extends observationally constrained projection toward calibrated predictions at the local scale and seasonal resolution where adaptation decisions are made.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Simon L. L. Michel, Kristian Strommen, and Hannah M. Christensen

Status: open (until 02 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Simon L. L. Michel, Kristian Strommen, and Hannah M. Christensen
Simon L. L. Michel, Kristian Strommen, and Hannah M. Christensen

Viewed

Total article views: 44 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
35 7 2 44 5 4 5
  • HTML: 35
  • PDF: 7
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 44
  • Supplement: 5
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Sep 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Sep 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 44 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 44 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 22 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
Uncertainty reduction methods for climate projections usually treat natural climate variability as noise to remove, which makes future uncertainty overconfident. We instead use deep learning to learn from the recent observed temperature trajectory and predict future local climate while retaining this variability. The method reduces total uncertainty in future warming and gives spatially resolved predictions from the 2030s to the 2090s, including at regional scales relevant for adaptation.
Share