Long-duration shipboard performance of a humidity-conditioned optical particulate matter monitor along inter-polar transit routes: Antarctic inter-unit agreement and Arctic redeployment
Abstract. Optical particulate matter (PM) measurements aboard ships are vulnerable to relative-humidity (RH)-dependent particle growth, sampling disturbances, and platform exhaust. We evaluated the long-duration field performance of the Tiny Aerosol Monitor with Tiny Aerosol Conditioner (TAM/TAC) using two co-deployed instruments during an Antarctic voyage and the subsequent Arctic redeployment of the same physical instrument (unit 70). The Antarctic loggers recorded every scheduled 10 min time step from 25 October 2022 to 3 May 2023 (27,342 records per unit), and unit 70 recorded every scheduled time step during the Arctic deployment from 21 June to 11 October 2023 (16,124 records). A prespecified quality-control rule excluded 50 Antarctic unit-70 records with nonzero instrument status codes, leaving 27,292 valid Antarctic pairs; unit 71 and the Arctic unit-70 dataset contained no flagged records. Across PM₁.₀, PM₂.₅, PM₄.₀, and PM₁₀, Antarctic inter-unit correlations were 0.995–0.997, equal-variance Deming slopes were 0.992–1.033, and relative mean biases were −1.1 % to +2.1 %. Paired relative precision was 9.0–9.8 % for PM₂.₅–PM₁₀ and 16.3 % for PM₁.₀, for which the route-wide mean was only about 1.53 µg m⁻³. In the polar subsets, TAC reduced mean ambient RH from 54.0 % to 32.2 % in the Antarctic and from 73.7 % to 34.5 % in the Arctic; internal RH was at or below 40 % for 99.99 % and 100 % of valid records, respectively. These results provide evidence of timebase continuity, inter-unit comparability, and repeatable humidity control across two extreme marine deployments. They do not establish absolute accuracy, inlet efficiency, or freedom from ship-exhaust contamination, which require a collocated reference instrument and ship-relative wind or exhaust-tracer measurements.
Competing interests: MS and SHB are affiliated with Gonggam Sensors Co., Ltd., the developer of the TAM/TAC system evaluated in this study, and therefore have a commercial interest in the technology. The authors declare no other competing interests.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.