Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5303
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5303
21 Sep 2026
 | 21 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf).

A simulation framework for scenario-based quantification of natural hazard protection provided by mountain forests

Peter Helander, Adrian Ringenbach, Peter Bebi, Werner Rammer, Rasoul Yousefpour, and Marc Hanewinkel

Abstract. Mountain forests often provide important protection against gravitational natural hazards. For this reason, developing management strategies that help maintain resilient forests withstanding climate change impacts is crucial. Existing approaches to quantify the protection against natural hazards provided by forests are often extensions of either forest or natural hazard simulation models. In both cases they tend to suffer from a rather coarse, static representation of their secondary component. Simulation results thus lack the temporally integrated perspective needed when modeling the outcome of interacting, partly stochastic processes. We present a simulation framework that allows for quantitative natural hazard assessment over time as a function of forest management and climate scenarios. By linking a process-based forest landscape model with a mass movement hazard simulation model on an annual basis throughout the simulation period, we integrate the effects of climate change and capture the complex interactions of forest growth, forest disturbances and natural hazards in mountain regions in unprecedented detail. This repeated coupling allows annual changes in forest structure to directly affect rockfall dynamics, while rockfall-induced tree mortality feeds back into subsequent forest development. We tested the framework in a case study area in the Swiss Alps and calculated the expected development of rockfall hazard beneath a currently spruce-dominated forest slope considering different forest management intensities. The residual rockfall hazard varied between 20% and 30% depending on the forest management scenario. Rock size and forest basal area had the strongest influence on protection efficiency. We deem the modeling framework suitable for scenario analysis in quantitative risk assessment, especially after disturbance events, as well as for identifying strategies to increase forest resilience in times of climate change. In conjunction with economic data on forest and infrastructure, the modeling framework even allows for integrated economic cost-benefit analysis of forest and natural hazard management.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Peter Helander, Adrian Ringenbach, Peter Bebi, Werner Rammer, Rasoul Yousefpour, and Marc Hanewinkel

Status: open (until 10 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Peter Helander, Adrian Ringenbach, Peter Bebi, Werner Rammer, Rasoul Yousefpour, and Marc Hanewinkel
Peter Helander, Adrian Ringenbach, Peter Bebi, Werner Rammer, Rasoul Yousefpour, and Marc Hanewinkel

Viewed

Total article views: 331 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
219 76 36 331 29 31
  • HTML: 219
  • PDF: 76
  • XML: 36
  • Total: 331
  • BibTeX: 29
  • EndNote: 31
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Sep 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Sep 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 331 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 331 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Mountain forests reduce the risk from rockfall, but climate change and forest management may alter this protection over time. To examine this effect, we linked simulations of forest development with rockfall modelling in a novel way. Through annual data exchange, forest changes and rockfall impacts influence each other over time. In the Swiss Alps, residual rockfall hazard varied between 20 and 30 percent across management and climate scenarios, showing how management can sustain protection.
Share