Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5235
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5235
12 Oct 2026
 | 12 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Evaluating metre-scale methane plume simulations with MicroHH against AVIRIS-4 remote sensing observations

Sandro Meier, Dominik Brunner, and Gerrit Kuhlmann

Abstract. High-resolution imaging spectrometers resolve anthropogenic plumes at metre to sub-metre scales, creating opportunities for emission quantification but requiring models that reproduce turbulent plume morphology at comparable resolution. We evaluate the large-eddy simulation model MicroHH against Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS-4) observations from 2024 controlled releases in France. Using site-specific wind, surface, and source parameters, we simulated the four releases with the longest plumes at 1 m horizontal resolution. Synthetic CH4 column enhancements were evaluated using plume structure, turbulence spectra, Gaussian cross-section statistics, along-plume flux variability, and plume power spectral density. For one release with a pronounced double plume, we integrated the three-dimensional model field along the slant illumination and viewing paths to investigate parallax effects. MicroHH reproduced the expected inertial-subrange behaviour of turbulent kinetic energy spectra and observed plume width, intermittency, and spatial power spectra for most releases. However, modelled vertical columns were more Gaussian than the observations and did not reproduce the double plumes. The exploratory slant-path calculation generated a comparable double structure, indicating that observational geometry can explain part of this discrepancy. Other differences likely reflect rapid near-source dilution at finite grid resolution, the absence of online plume-rise and buoyancy treatments, and omitted obstacle effects on near-surface flow. Overall, MicroHH can generate realistic high-resolution synthetic plume imagery for retrieval evaluation and machine-learning applications when inputs are well constrained and observational geometry is considered. This first systematic multi-metric comparison of LES plume morphology with metre-scale imaging-spectrometer observations provides a validation framework for other high-resolution dispersion models.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sandro Meier, Dominik Brunner, and Gerrit Kuhlmann

Status: open (until 23 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sandro Meier, Dominik Brunner, and Gerrit Kuhlmann

Data sets

Metre-scale MicroHH CH4 plume simulations for comparison with AVIRIS-4 observations S. Meier et al. https://zenodo.org/records/22029716

Model code and software

MicroHH C. C. van Heerwaarden et al. https://github.com/microhh/microhh

Sandro Meier, Dominik Brunner, and Gerrit Kuhlmann
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 12 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Accurate computer-generated methane plumes could improve efforts to find and measure greenhouse gas emissions. We compared metre-scale simulations with images of controlled methane releases collected from an aircraft in France. The model reproduced most observed plume shapes and variations, but the viewing geometry caused important differences. Accounting for these effects can make satellite measurements and automated plume detection more reliable.
Share