Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-521
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-521
24 Mar 2026
 | 24 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Scale-dependent spatial coherence between historical and instrumental earthquake catalogues at the global scale

Antonino D'Alessandro

Abstract. Historical earthquake catalogues extend seismic observations back by several centuries and are widely used in seismic hazard and tectonic studies, yet their global-scale informational content remains difficult to quantify due to strong spatial, temporal, and magnitude-dependent reporting biases. In this study, we present a quantitative, spatially explicit assessment of the consistency between global historical (1600–1899) and early instrumental (1900–1950, ) earthquake catalogues. Rather than relying on magnitude-based comparisons, we represent earthquake occurrence as spatial probability density fields obtained through Gaussian smoothing and define a scale-dependent spatial coherence metric based on the overlap between historical and instrumental distributions. This approach allows us to isolate large-scale tectonic signal from localized reporting artefacts and to systematically explore the role of spatial scale. Our results show that spatial coherence between historical and instrumental seismicity is low at small scales and increases monotonically with smoothing length, reaching moderate values only at regional to continental scales. Even at the largest scales considered, coherence remains well below unity, indicating that only a limited fraction of the instrumental spatial pattern is recoverable from historical data. Decomposition by tectonic domain reveals that subduction zones dominate the historical–instrumental agreement, while continental collision belts and intraplate regions contribute substantially less. These findings demonstrate that global historical earthquake catalogues contain a detectable but intrinsically limited imprint of tectonic structure. Meaningful use of historical seismicity at the global scale therefore requires explicit consideration of spatial scale and tectonic context. The framework proposed here provides a transparent and reproducible basis for evaluating the reliability of historical earthquake data in seismic hazard and global seismotectonic applications.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Antonino D'Alessandro

Status: open (until 05 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Antonino D'Alessandro
Antonino D'Alessandro

Viewed

Total article views: 66 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
50 14 2 66 1 0
  • HTML: 50
  • PDF: 14
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 66
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Mar 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Mar 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 66 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 66 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Historical earthquake records extend knowledge of past earthquakes but are uneven and incomplete. This study compares historical and early modern earthquake locations worldwide to test how well historical data reflect real earthquake patterns. We show that historical records capture large-scale tectonic features but miss details at smaller scales. This means historical earthquakes are useful for broad hazard studies, but not for detailed local assessments.
Share