Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5197
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5197
30 Oct 2026
 | 30 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

The ARTMIP Tier 2 Polar Synthesis: A comparative analysis of polar atmospheric river detection tools in historical and future climate states

Kyle S. Mattingly, Michelle Maclennan, Joseph Schnaubelt, Christine Shields, Rebecca Baiman, Alexander Y. Massa, Kyle Nardi, Serena R. Scholz, Rudradutt Thaker, Chen Zhang, Seung H. Baek, Tobias Braun, Victoire Buffet, James Butler, Bo Dong, Vincent Favier, Irina Gorodetskaya, Bin Guan, Marlen Kolbe, Melanie Lauer, Gabrielle Linscott, Juan M. Lora, Mengqian Lu, Weiming Ma, Sophia Macarewich, Gudrun Magnusdottir, Travis A. O'Brien, Sofie Tiedeck, Sara M. Vallejo-Bernal, Carolina Viceto, Jonathan D. Wille, Jing Yang, Zhenhai Zhang, and Xun Zou

Abstract. Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are the conduit for the majority of atmospheric moisture transport to the polar regions and influence the evolution of polar ice sheets and sea ice. Their impacts on the polar cryosphere are expected to intensify as atmospheric moisture content and temperatures increase in a warming climate. Previous Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project (ARTMIP) studies show that quantitative and qualitative conclusions about the global climatology, impacts, and future changes of ARs depend on the choice of AR detection tool (ARDT) used in the analysis. There is a community need for a similar comparison of ARDTs in the polar regions (both the Arctic and Antarctica), where the unique atmospheric conditions require different parameters for AR detection relative to global ARDTs.

Here, we present the ARTMIP polar synthesis experiment, a collaborative effort to provide community guidance on best practices for ARDT selection in polar studies. We build upon the existing ARTMIP framework to curate and compare AR catalogues from eleven ARDTs that have been developed for polar AR identification. We first analyze Arctic and Antarctic AR climatology across ARDTs in the historical record using MERRA-2 atmospheric reanalysis, focusing on similarities and differences among ARDTs linked to their algorithm design, and the effect of inter-ARDT differences on AR-attributed ice sheet and sea ice impacts. We then extend our analysis to future AR projections by applying a subset of ARDTs to three representative members of the CESM2 large ensemble under the SSP3-7.0 emissions scenario up to the year 2099. Finally, we use a subset of five ARDTs in a case study to assess the sensitivity of existing ARDTs to changes in detection thresholds.

Our results show that polar ARDTs can generally be grouped into two categories based on their detection of AR frequency and impacts: (1) "global heritage" ARDTs that were originally developed for global AR studies and subsequently tuned for polar AR detection; and (2) "Antarctic heritage" ARDTs that were developed from inception for AR detection in the interior of Antarctica. The global heritage ARDTs generally show polar AR frequency and impacts that peak in the oceanic storm tracks of both the Northern and Southern hemispheres and decrease toward the poles, with little to no ARs identified in the interior of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. The Antarctic heritage ARDTs, conversely, show a less pronounced meridional gradient in AR detection in both hemispheres, and attribute a substantial proportion of precipitation in the Antarctic interior to ARs. Global heritage ARDTs show a large spread in future AR projections due to their varied algorithm design parameters, while Antarctic heritage ARDTs show greater cross-algorithm consistency in projecting small increases in AR frequency. Our polar synthesis leads us to recommend that researchers carefully consider their research questions and study region when choosing which ARDT(s) to use, and following the guidance from previous ARTMIP experiments, we recommend using multiple ARDTs to constrain uncertainty related to AR detection where possible.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Kyle S. Mattingly, Michelle Maclennan, Joseph Schnaubelt, Christine Shields, Rebecca Baiman, Alexander Y. Massa, Kyle Nardi, Serena R. Scholz, Rudradutt Thaker, Chen Zhang, Seung H. Baek, Tobias Braun, Victoire Buffet, James Butler, Bo Dong, Vincent Favier, Irina Gorodetskaya, Bin Guan, Marlen Kolbe, Melanie Lauer, Gabrielle Linscott, Juan M. Lora, Mengqian Lu, Weiming Ma, Sophia Macarewich, Gudrun Magnusdottir, Travis A. O'Brien, Sofie Tiedeck, Sara M. Vallejo-Bernal, Carolina Viceto, Jonathan D. Wille, Jing Yang, Zhenhai Zhang, and Xun Zou

Status: open (until 11 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Kyle S. Mattingly, Michelle Maclennan, Joseph Schnaubelt, Christine Shields, Rebecca Baiman, Alexander Y. Massa, Kyle Nardi, Serena R. Scholz, Rudradutt Thaker, Chen Zhang, Seung H. Baek, Tobias Braun, Victoire Buffet, James Butler, Bo Dong, Vincent Favier, Irina Gorodetskaya, Bin Guan, Marlen Kolbe, Melanie Lauer, Gabrielle Linscott, Juan M. Lora, Mengqian Lu, Weiming Ma, Sophia Macarewich, Gudrun Magnusdottir, Travis A. O'Brien, Sofie Tiedeck, Sara M. Vallejo-Bernal, Carolina Viceto, Jonathan D. Wille, Jing Yang, Zhenhai Zhang, and Xun Zou
Kyle S. Mattingly, Michelle Maclennan, Joseph Schnaubelt, Christine Shields, Rebecca Baiman, Alexander Y. Massa, Kyle Nardi, Serena R. Scholz, Rudradutt Thaker, Chen Zhang, Seung H. Baek, Tobias Braun, Victoire Buffet, James Butler, Bo Dong, Vincent Favier, Irina Gorodetskaya, Bin Guan, Marlen Kolbe, Melanie Lauer, Gabrielle Linscott, Juan M. Lora, Mengqian Lu, Weiming Ma, Sophia Macarewich, Gudrun Magnusdottir, Travis A. O'Brien, Sofie Tiedeck, Sara M. Vallejo-Bernal, Carolina Viceto, Jonathan D. Wille, Jing Yang, Zhenhai Zhang, and Xun Zou
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 30 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are narrow bands of water vapor that bring warm, moist air to Earth's polar regions. Our understanding of how ARs affect polar ice sheets and sea ice is sensitive to the AR detection method chosen. In this research, we find that some AR detection methods are better suited for marine areas, while others excel in the interior of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. These results will help constrain uncertainty in projections of polar environmental change linked to ARs.
Share