Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5187
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5187
09 Sep 2026
 | 09 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Temperature sensitivity of glacier ablation models in high-elevation regions

Benjamin Graves, Tom Matthews, Tamsin Edwards, Richard Taylor, Megan James, Baker Perry, and Magali Ponds

Abstract. Glacier mass balances in high mountain regions across the world are projected to decline as a result of climate warming. However, the modelled response of glaciers to increasing temperatures depends strongly on the temperature sensitivity of the mass-balance model used. Most modelling studies employ empirical modelling approaches for simulating glacier mass balances, but the effectiveness of empirical approaches has been questioned for high-elevation regions due to a partial decoupling between temperature variations and ablation. This study compares the temperature sensitivities of two empirical and two energy-balance models when applied at high elevations (~6500 m) on the Khumbu Glacier, Mount Everest. The empirical models have a temperature sensitivity more than double that of the energy-balance models when the same warming experiments were applied. This bias indicates that future projections of glacier mass balances in high-elevation regions produced using empirical mass-balance modelling will likely be more negative than if energy-balance approaches were applied, and consequently that existing global mass-balance projections may overestimate future glacier recession in similar high-elevation regions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Benjamin Graves, Tom Matthews, Tamsin Edwards, Richard Taylor, Megan James, Baker Perry, and Magali Ponds

Status: open (until 21 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Benjamin Graves, Tom Matthews, Tamsin Edwards, Richard Taylor, Megan James, Baker Perry, and Magali Ponds
Benjamin Graves, Tom Matthews, Tamsin Edwards, Richard Taylor, Megan James, Baker Perry, and Magali Ponds
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 09 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
The future of the world’s glaciers under climate change is simulated using models. However, the modelled response of glaciers to rising temperatures is stronger in some models than in others. This study compares the simulated behaviour of a glacier at high elevation using four models to compare how each one reacts to rising temperatures. Simple models respond more strongly than is realistic, because they do not account for the full range of environmental factors which affect the glacier.
Share