Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5135
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5135
07 Oct 2026
 | 07 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Mutual constraints on global aerosol composition from novel PACE data and ModelE

Sylvain Foisy, Susanne E. Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Otto Hasekamp, and Guangliang Fu

Abstract. Aerosol climate impacts remain uncertain, in part because global aerosol composition observations have been unavailable to constrain Earth System Models (ESMs). We present the first comparison of aerosol composition from the Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) satellite’s Spectropolarimeter for Planetary Exploration one (SPEXone) against an ESM, co-locating Remote sensing of Trace gas and Aerosol Products (RemoTAP) retrievals with NASA GISS ModelE simulations to within ±15 minutes over 2024–2025. In the fine mode, the two correlate well over land, capturing the same seasonal biomass burning and pollution cycles. The coarse mode, however, diverges: mineral dust agrees to within ∼10 % by volume over land, yet SPEXone exceeds ModelE eightfold over ocean, where it covaries with modeled sea salt and increases away from desert sources. Because SPEXone partitions the coarse mode on shape alone, we suggest this excess is nonspherical marine aerosol rather than mineral dust. Finally, ModelE carries a median 3.6 times the water per unit dry sea salt that SPEXone infers over ocean. Substituting reanalysis relative humidity (RH) and an observationally constrained hygroscopicity each move the model toward the retrieval, but neither alone nor together do they reproduce it. This factor amounts to only 0.027 in global median effective marine refractive index, amplified by the nonlinearity of the mixing rule used to infer water. Together, these results provide a first evaluation of modeled aerosol composition against PACE SPEXone retrievals.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sylvain Foisy, Susanne E. Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Otto Hasekamp, and Guangliang Fu

Status: open (until 18 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sylvain Foisy, Susanne E. Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Otto Hasekamp, and Guangliang Fu
Sylvain Foisy, Susanne E. Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Otto Hasekamp, and Guangliang Fu
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 07 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Solid and liquid particles in the sky cool the planet, but we have had limited global measurements, so climate models are not well evaluated. We compare a satellite with novel capabilities launched in 2024 against a NASA model. They agree on the amount over land, but over the ocean the satellite reports eight times more desert dust than the model; we argue this is likely non-spherical sea salt. The model also holds four times more water on its particles, which we trace to how each infers water.
Share