Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-513
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-513
23 Mar 2026
 | 23 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).

Impacts of land-use and land-cover change on blue–green water partitioning

Simon P. Heselschwerdt, Abhinav Dengri, Nora L. S. Fahrenbach, and Peter Greve

Abstract. Land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) is a major driver of terrestrial water cycle changes, yet its effects on how precipitation is partitioned into blue (runoff) and green water (transpiration) flows remain unclear. Here we address this knowledge gap using Earth system model simulations from the Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) under contrasting socioeconomic pathways (SSP1-2.6 and SSP3-7.0). We find that future sustainable LULCC (i.e., predominantly avoided deforestation and preservation of natural non-forest ecosystems) significantly impacts blue-green water partitioning, with regions showing positive leaf area index (LAI) and gross primary productivity (GPP) responses generally corresponding to larger green water shares. These effects are strongest in the tropics and particularly during dry seasons, where LAI and GPP responses are largest. Regions with the strongest green water gains show the highest sensitivity of blue-green water partitioning to vegetation responses, with the largest partitioning shifts per unit change in LAI or GPP. Precipitation responses to LULCC further modulate the strength of blue–green water partitioning shifts. In some regions, higher transpiration is partly offset by increased rainfall, limiting reductions in blue water availability. While we find consistent ecohydrological responses to LULCC across the multi-model ensemble mean, substantial regional inter-model disagreement arises due to differences in model-specific plant functional types and their parametrisations. Our results underscore that the water cost or benefit of land management depends jointly on vegetation function, precipitation feedbacks, and model structural uncertainty.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Simon P. Heselschwerdt, Abhinav Dengri, Nora L. S. Fahrenbach, and Peter Greve

Status: open (until 04 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Simon P. Heselschwerdt, Abhinav Dengri, Nora L. S. Fahrenbach, and Peter Greve
Simon P. Heselschwerdt, Abhinav Dengri, Nora L. S. Fahrenbach, and Peter Greve
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 23 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) can alter how precipitation is divided between river flow and water used by plants. To understand the water impacts of future LULCC, we analyse four Earth system models under a sustainable LULCC pathway. Conservation often increases plant water use, strongest in tropical dry seasons. Yet, additional rainfall reduces losses in river water in some places. Differences among models mean regional water outcomes remain uncertain for land and water planning.
Share