the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Key parameters to improve prediction of the drift and resurfacing of human bodies following drowning in rivers
Abstract. Drowning is a major global health concern, and urban rivers pose a significant risk. Climate change is leading to increasingly frequent extreme floods and heatwaves, which drive people to bathe in urban water bodies. The rapid recovery of victims is critical for their survival, as well as for investigations, and first responder safety. Recent research highlights the potential of combining hydrodynamic computer simulations with drift modelling to predict the trajectory of drowning victims’ bodies. The present study uses a unique dataset of 50 real-world fatal drowning cases to identify two key parameters needed to improve computer simulations of body drift in urban rivers: the initial body buoyancy (i.e. before the effects of decomposition) and the body submersion interval. The results reveal that older age and a higher body mass index are significantly correlated with increased initial buoyancy, due to physiological factors such as lower bone density and higher body fat content. Bodies of victims over the age of 65 are almost four times more likely to remain afloat. A temperature threshold of around 7 °C appears to limit body floatability, and lower water temperatures are associated with longer body submersion intervals due to slower decomposition. A resurfacing value of 97 °C · days was estimated for the ‘accumulated degree days’ (ADD), a criterion which has been recommended for predicting the body resurfacing time but has barely been quantified in prior studies. Additionally, older female individuals with a higher BMI were found to be significantly more likely to be victims of suicidal drowning, indicating a distinct risk profile that is important for prevention strategies. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating empirical data into drift models and building larger, transnational databases to improve predictive accuracy and save lives.
- Preprint
(938 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(987 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 20 Oct 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-5071', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Sep 2026 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-5071', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Oct 2026
reply
This study addresses an interesting and important topic: improving the prediction of drift and resurfacing of drowning victims using information derived from real cases. The apparent thresholds around 65 years of age and approximately 7 °C water temperature are particularly interesting exploratory results. However, I have several questions that I believe should be addressed before publication.
- My main concern relates to the dataset and the degree of inference involved. I appreciate that detailed data on drowning cases are difficult to obtain and may be privacy-sensitive, and the authors have clearly worked with the information available. Nevertheless, the dataset is highly heterogeneous, with substantial missing, estimated, reconstructed, or inferred information. It would therefore be helpful to clearly distinguish how much of the dataset is based on direct or official observations and how much is inferred or estimated. The inclusion of only three additional cases from Ghent, Namur, and Strasbourg, apparently based on media reports rather than official records, should also be justified: why were these particular cases selected and not others?
- The abstract gives considerable prominence to the finding that older female victims with higher BMI were more frequently associated with suicidal drowning. However, the stated objective of the study is mainly related to flotation/submergence and resurfacing in support of drift prediction. Should this result then be so prominent in the abstract, particularly since drowning circumstances were inferred in 21 cases, as stated in Sect. 2.3?
- Regarding water temperature, it would be useful to clarify which temperature time series were assigned to individual cases, where the corresponding measurement or model locations were situated relative to the presumed body location, and at what depth the temperature data apply. Since the actual location and depth of the body during submersion are generally unknown, the assigned temperature history may not necessarily represent the temperature experienced by the body. This limitation should be stated more explicitly.
- It may be helpful to distinguish more clearly between the binary empirical flotation state and quantitative physical buoyancy, particularly when interpreting correlations as indicating “increased buoyancy”, since no buoyant force, body density, displaced volume, or similar physical quantity was estimated.
- Finally, the recent review by Lara Indra (2026), Forensic taphonomy in fluvial water: A systematic review, seems highly relevant to the framing of this study, particularly because it identifies prediction of fluvial transport and vertical movement of human remains as important unresolved challenges. I suggest considering it in the final part of Sect. 1.2.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5071-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 245 | 116 | 45 | 406 | 55 | 48 | 52 |
- HTML: 245
- PDF: 116
- XML: 45
- Total: 406
- Supplement: 55
- BibTeX: 48
- EndNote: 52
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This study identifies key physical factors governing body drift simulations in urban rivers. Initial buoyancy (before decomposition effects) and the submersion interval before resurfacing are identified. Older age and higher BMI were significantly associated with greater initial buoyancy, and were attributed to physiological factors such as reduced bone density and higher body fat content (i.e. victims over 65 were nearly four times more likely to remain afloat). Floatability appeared to be limited above a threshold of ~7°C. The manuscript concludes that incorporating such data into drift models is needed to improve predictive accuracy.
The paper addresses a relevant topic and some of the findings can be relevant. However, at present, I have concerns about recommending publication without the following points to be addressed thoroughly: