Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5052
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5052
08 Sep 2026
 | 08 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Combustion controls and plume structure of wildfire aerosol optical properties observed by TROPOMI

Barbara Dix, Lindsey D. Anderson, J. Pepijn Veefkind, and Joost de Gouw

Abstract. Wildfire smoke influences air quality and climate through the scattering and absorption of solar radiation by aerosol particles, yet the factors controlling aerosol optical properties and their spatial variability within smoke plumes remain uncertain. Here, we use satellite observations of aerosol optical properties and trace gases from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) to investigate the influence of combustion conditions on aerosol optical properties and their spatial variability within wildfire smoke plumes during the Australian 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 bushfire seasons.

Substantial differences in aerosol optical depth (AOD) and single-scattering albedo (SSA) are observed among major land cover types. Wildfires characterized by stronger flaming combustion, inferred from nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and carbon monoxide (CO) column density ratios (ΔNO2/ΔCO), are associated with more absorbing plume-averaged aerosol populations, whereas smoldering-dominated fires are associated with more scattering smoke and larger AOD. These relationships indicate that combustion conditions exert a first-order control on aerosol absorptivity, while aerosol loading is more strongly influenced by total emissions. Within individual plumes, aerosol loading and trace gas abundance remain concentrated in NO2-defined plume cores, whereas SSA exhibits much weaker spatial gradients. Independent box-size analyses further show a systematic tendency toward higher SSA away from plume cores and source regions while ΔNO2/ΔCO decreases, indicating that these spatial changes occur concurrently with atmospheric processing. Although chemical processing, dilution, and mixing cannot be separated, these observations provide constraints for evaluating model representations of wildfire emissions, plume evolution, and smoke radiative effects.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Barbara Dix, Lindsey D. Anderson, J. Pepijn Veefkind, and Joost de Gouw

Status: open (until 20 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Barbara Dix, Lindsey D. Anderson, J. Pepijn Veefkind, and Joost de Gouw

Data sets

Smoke-Plume-Processing: v1.0.0 – Version accompanying manuscript submission Barbara Dix https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22036261

Model code and software

Smoke-Plume-Processing: v1.0.0 – Version accompanying manuscript submission Barbara Dix https://github.com/barbarakdix1200/Smoke-Plume-Processing

Barbara Dix, Lindsey D. Anderson, J. Pepijn Veefkind, and Joost de Gouw
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 08 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
Wildfire smoke affects climate, but its properties depend on how fires burn and how smoke changes after emission. Using satellite observations of Australian wildfires, we found that flaming fires produce more light-absorbing smoke, while smoldering fires produce more aerosol that scatters light. Smoke becomes more optically uniform away from fire cores, showing that both combustion and early plume processing shape its climate effects.
Share