Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5035
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5035
18 Sep 2026
 | 18 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Initiation Timing Improves Retrogressive Thaw Slump Susceptibility Mapping on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

Pengfei Li, Zhuotong Nan, Jiwei Xu, and Fujun Niu

Abstract. Accelerating retrogressive thaw slump (RTS) activity is reshaping permafrost landscapes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) and threatening infrastructure. Forward-looking assessment requires identifying slopes approaching failure rather than mapping past RTS occurrence. Conventional susceptibility models treat RTS initiation as a binary outcome, making pre-initiation locations effectively equivalent regardless of when they subsequently fail. Yet under progressive environmental forcing, initiation timing can provide an implicit ordering of susceptibility: earlier initiation may indicate greater susceptibility than later initiation. We therefore defined Years Before Initiation (YBI) from annual inventories and developed a weakly supervised ranking framework that uses initiation-time ordering to learn susceptibility gradients. The Annual-YBI model was compared with two conventional models (Static Binary and Annual Binary) sharing the same neural network architecture. Although all models performed similarly in five-fold cross-validation (ROC-AUC ≈ 0.988), the Annual-YBI model captured 89.45 % of 199 temporally held-out RTS initiations in 2021–2022 within the top 10 % susceptibility area, compared with 79.90 % and 63.82 % for Annual Binary and Static Binary models, respectively. SHAP analysis identified NDVI, slope, and ground ice content as primary predisposing factors, with modulation by annual hydroclimatic variables. The 2021–2022 maximum susceptibility composite classified 1.70 × 105 km2 (15.6 % of QTP permafrost) as high or very high susceptibility, including 42.8 % of permafrost within the 20-km Qinghai–Tibet Engineering Corridor buffer. These results show that initiation timing provides weak supervision for susceptibility gradients that binary labels cannot resolve, improving identification of locations prone to future RTS initiation and offering potential for transfer to other permafrost regions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Pengfei Li, Zhuotong Nan, Jiwei Xu, and Fujun Niu

Status: open (until 30 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Pengfei Li, Zhuotong Nan, Jiwei Xu, and Fujun Niu

Model code and software

nanzt/YBIRTS-Susceptibility: v1.0.0 Pengfei Li and Zhuotong Nan https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20603769

Pengfei Li, Zhuotong Nan, Jiwei Xu, and Fujun Niu
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 18 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
Most susceptibility models reduce multi-year inventories to binary occurrence labels and make little use of when failures occurred. We use the temporal ordering of pre-initiation states as weak supervision for susceptibility. Using annual retrogressive thaw slump inventories, the framework captured 89.45 % of 2021–2022 initiations within the top 10 % susceptibility area. The principle may apply to landslides and other mass-movement processes with multi-temporal initiation inventories.
Share