Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5010
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5010
31 Aug 2026
 | 31 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

CO2 influx and efflux circadian cycles in bare dry lake sediments

Pelin Erturk Ari, Rafael Marcé, Oriol Sacristán-Soriano, Duygu Tolunay, Carles M. Borrego, Sílvia Poblador, Biel Obrador, Enrique Moreno-Ostos, Jorge J. Montes-Pérez, Teresa Conejo-Orosa, Matthias Koschorreck, Josep Peñuelas, and Núria Catalán

Abstract. Permanent and temporary drying of inland waters expands the surface area of exposed sediments, potentially altering total ecosystem CO₂ fluxes. However, the response of CO₂ fluxes from dry sediments to episodic rewetting, and the relative roles of biotic and abiotic exchange mechanisms in shaping net fluxes, remain poorly understood. Here, we conducted a field rewetting experiment on long-term exposed sediments of Lake Gallocanta (Spain) to assess rewetting-induced variations in CO₂ fluxes. CO₂ exchanges between sediments and the atmosphere were measured before and after rewetting using closed gas chambers, and the isotopic composition of emitted CO₂ (δ¹³C-CO₂) was analyzed. Sediment samples were also collected to characterize key physicochemical properties (e.g., water activity, temperature, pH) and to assess changes in microbial community composition. In addition, a numerical model integrating gas flux and isotope data was developed to disentangle biotic and abiotic contributions to total CO₂ emissions. Contrary to expectations, rewetting had minimal influence on CO₂ flux magnitudes, which instead exhibited a pronounced circadian pattern of efflux and influx. Although rewetting substantially altered microbial community structure, these changes did not indicate that biological carbon fixation explained the observed CO₂ influx. Model simulations incorporating both biotic and abiotic processes indicated that abiotic mechanisms, most likely carbonate weathering, dominated CO₂ influx, whereas aerobic respiration accounted for midday efflux. Overall, our results highlight the critical role of abiotic processes in regulating CO₂ dynamics from long-term desiccated lake sediments and suggest that net CO₂ fluxes may not reliably indicate organic carbon remobilization under dry lake conditions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Pelin Erturk Ari, Rafael Marcé, Oriol Sacristán-Soriano, Duygu Tolunay, Carles M. Borrego, Sílvia Poblador, Biel Obrador, Enrique Moreno-Ostos, Jorge J. Montes-Pérez, Teresa Conejo-Orosa, Matthias Koschorreck, Josep Peñuelas, and Núria Catalán

Status: open (until 12 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Pelin Erturk Ari, Rafael Marcé, Oriol Sacristán-Soriano, Duygu Tolunay, Carles M. Borrego, Sílvia Poblador, Biel Obrador, Enrique Moreno-Ostos, Jorge J. Montes-Pérez, Teresa Conejo-Orosa, Matthias Koschorreck, Josep Peñuelas, and Núria Catalán
Pelin Erturk Ari, Rafael Marcé, Oriol Sacristán-Soriano, Duygu Tolunay, Carles M. Borrego, Sílvia Poblador, Biel Obrador, Enrique Moreno-Ostos, Jorge J. Montes-Pérez, Teresa Conejo-Orosa, Matthias Koschorreck, Josep Peñuelas, and Núria Catalán
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 31 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Rewetting dry sediments of Lake Gallocanta had little effect on carbon dioxide (CO₂) fluxes, which showed strong daily cycles of emission and uptake. Despite changes in microbial community composition, biological carbon fixation did not explain CO₂ uptake. Modeling of CO₂ flux and isotope data showed that abiotic processes, likely weathering, dominated CO₂ uptake, while respiration drove emissions. These results highlight the importance of abiotic controls on CO₂ dynamics in dry sediments.
Share