Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4977
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4977
02 Sep 2026
 | 02 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).

The impacts of remediation techniques on soil functions: a review

Paul Drenning, Kristiina Nuottimäki, Nazaré Couto, and Virginie Derycke

Abstract. Soil contamination is a major driver of soil degradation in Europe, and remediation practices are increasingly expected to support not only risk reduction but also the recovery of soil health and ecosystem services. In line with the European Soil Monitoring and Resilience Directive, this review evaluates how commonly applied remediation techniques impact key soil functions that underpin soil health. A structured narrative review of the literature was conducted to assess the impacts of conventional (physical and chemical) and low‑impact (biological and nature‑based) remediation techniques on six aggregated soil functions: organic matter storage and transformation, water regulation, nutrient cycling, contaminant retention and degradation, physical stability, and habitat provision. The analysis shows that conventional remediation techniques such as thermal treatment, soil washing, in‑situ chemical oxidation/reduction, and stabilization/solidification frequently achieve effective contaminant removal but often cause substantial and sometimes irreversible degradation of soil structure, organic matter, microbial activity, and habitat quality. In contrast, low‑impact remediation approaches, including bioremediation, phytoremediation, monitored natural attenuation, and immobilization with organic or selected inorganic amendments tend to preserve or enhance soil functions, although typically at slower contaminant removal rates and with strong site specificity. The review highlights critical knowledge gaps, particularly regarding limited information on specific remediation techniques and impacts on soil fauna, the limited availability of quantitative thresholds for when a soil can be considered healthy or unhealthy for performing various functions, and limited soil health assessments in urban and industrial context. Hybrid and adaptive remediation strategies that combine risk reduction with rehabilitation measures are identified as key to balancing risk reduction and soil functionality while also planning for refunctionalization at the onset as part of the soil health trajectory. Overall, embedding soil health as a central management objective is essential for sustainable contaminated land management aligned with European policy goals.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Paul Drenning, Kristiina Nuottimäki, Nazaré Couto, and Virginie Derycke

Status: open (until 14 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Paul Drenning, Kristiina Nuottimäki, Nazaré Couto, and Virginie Derycke
Paul Drenning, Kristiina Nuottimäki, Nazaré Couto, and Virginie Derycke
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 02 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
This study reviews how different conventional (e.g., thermal treatment, soil washing) and low-impact (e.g., bioremediation) soil remediation methods impact soil health. By analysing scientific studies, it shows that conventional techniques remove contaminants quickly but often damage key soil properties, while low-impact techniques better preserve or even improve soil health. The findings highlight the need to balance risk reduction with soil functionality to consider soil health from the start.
Share