Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4973
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4973
04 Sep 2026
 | 04 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Temperate agroforestry systems take up more CO2 compared to conventional crop- or grassland, without consuming more water

José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas, Justus G. V. van Ramshorst, Alexander Knohl, Sarah Choe, Maren Langhof, and Christian Markwitz

Abstract. Ecosystem-atmosphere interactions remain poorly quantified in temperate agroforestry systems despite their potential as nature-based solutions against climate change. In this study, we present CO2 and H2O balances measured with eddy covariance over four pairs of agroforestry with open cropland or grassland systems in northern Germany from 2019 to 2024. Annual sums of net ecosystem CO2 uptake were generally 1.2- to 4-fold larger at agroforestry sites (average of -113.9 g C m-2 yr-1) compared to open cropland or grassland (average of 20.4 g C m-2 yr-1), while differences in evapotranspiration between systems were comparatively small (averages of 473.7 mm yr-1 and 423.5 mm yr-1, respectively). Water-use efficiency was thus generally higher at agroforestry, driven primarily by enhanced photosynthetic activity. Site-years with winter crops showed stronger carbon uptake, mostly due to reduced soil emissions in winter. Overall, the inclusion of trees resulted in an extended growing season and reduced sensitivity of these agroecosystems to high air temperature and low soil moisture. Furthermore, although net biome production was positive for most of the site-years, indicating a net carbon release, its magnitude was two or three times higher at open croplands and grassland than agroforestry, indicating stronger carbon losses from the reference systems that always showed a positive balance. These results reveal the potential of agroforestry systems as nature-based solution for climate change mitigation in agriculture, without compromising water availability.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas, Justus G. V. van Ramshorst, Alexander Knohl, Sarah Choe, Maren Langhof, and Christian Markwitz

Status: open (until 16 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas, Justus G. V. van Ramshorst, Alexander Knohl, Sarah Choe, Maren Langhof, and Christian Markwitz

Data sets

Dataset corresponding to this publication. José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21353133

Model code and software

Code for perform paper's analyses. José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas https://github.com/jangelcrgot/nee_et_wue_agroforestry.git

José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas, Justus G. V. van Ramshorst, Alexander Knohl, Sarah Choe, Maren Langhof, and Christian Markwitz
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
Temperate agroforestry systems took up more carbon dioxide than reference, conventional open cropland or grassland systems, without consuming more water from the soil. These findings are promising because they promote the implementation of agroforestry as a nature-based strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, and therefore climate change, in agricultural systems.
Share