the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Temperate agroforestry systems take up more CO2 compared to conventional crop- or grassland, without consuming more water
Abstract. Ecosystem-atmosphere interactions remain poorly quantified in temperate agroforestry systems despite their potential as nature-based solutions against climate change. In this study, we present CO2 and H2O balances measured with eddy covariance over four pairs of agroforestry with open cropland or grassland systems in northern Germany from 2019 to 2024. Annual sums of net ecosystem CO2 uptake were generally 1.2- to 4-fold larger at agroforestry sites (average of -113.9 g C m-2 yr-1) compared to open cropland or grassland (average of 20.4 g C m-2 yr-1), while differences in evapotranspiration between systems were comparatively small (averages of 473.7 mm yr-1 and 423.5 mm yr-1, respectively). Water-use efficiency was thus generally higher at agroforestry, driven primarily by enhanced photosynthetic activity. Site-years with winter crops showed stronger carbon uptake, mostly due to reduced soil emissions in winter. Overall, the inclusion of trees resulted in an extended growing season and reduced sensitivity of these agroecosystems to high air temperature and low soil moisture. Furthermore, although net biome production was positive for most of the site-years, indicating a net carbon release, its magnitude was two or three times higher at open croplands and grassland than agroforestry, indicating stronger carbon losses from the reference systems that always showed a positive balance. These results reveal the potential of agroforestry systems as nature-based solution for climate change mitigation in agriculture, without compromising water availability.
- Preprint
(11165 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1651 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 29 Oct 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4973', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Oct 2026 reply
Data sets
Dataset corresponding to this publication. José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21353133
Model code and software
Code for perform paper's analyses. José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas https://github.com/jangelcrgot/nee_et_wue_agroforestry.git
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 285 | 111 | 53 | 449 | 64 | 56 | 60 |
- HTML: 285
- PDF: 111
- XML: 53
- Total: 449
- Supplement: 64
- BibTeX: 56
- EndNote: 60
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Review of “Temperate agroforestry systems take up more CO2 compared to conventional crop- or grassland, without consuming more water” by Callejas-Rodelas et al., for Biogeosciences
Summary
The manuscript presents findings from eight eddy covariance towers across Germany that represent four pairs of sites: agroforestry adjacent to an open cropland or grassland. As the title indicates, the data show that agroforestry sites indeed take up more CO2 relative to conventional systems and without using more water (via evapotranspiration). This is an impressive dataset (also it’s very nice to see that the data is already published in a peer-reviewed data journal format), spanning several years and different types of production systems. The results should be relevant and of interest to readers of this journal, and to farm practitioners (or the surrounding ‘ecosystem’, like those developing incentive programs). To that end some additional context about relative differences in harvest yield, farm economics or management, labor concerns, etc., as well as the potential limits of extrapolation of the findings, would help these audiences understand the full relevance of the science. The technical writing and construction (and captions) of the figures can be improved, as can some of the analysis.
Major comments
Minor comments
Technical comments