the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Unravelling the Drivers of Soil Health: A Standardised Typology and Evidence Synthesis Across Europe
Abstract. Diverse and dynamic drivers shape European soils, and with most soils considered unhealthy, understanding these drivers is essential for effective soil management. Yet inconsistent terminology and classification across studies limit comparison and synthesis of evidence. This study addresses this gap through a systematic synthesis of 451 studies and an iterative standardisation process involving expert-based classification of soil health drivers, resulting in a standardised typology. The typology groups drivers into six categories: technology and management, nature and environment, demography, policy and institutional arrangements, socio-cultural context, and economy, and provides a basis for examining patterns in driver representation across land use types, locations, and Soil Health Objectives (SHOs) defined by the Horizon Europe Soil Mission. Technology and management drivers, together with climate-related drivers within the nature and environment category, are the most frequently represented across agriculture, forest, nature, and urban land uses. The evidence base is geographically uneven, revealing where research attention has concentrated across Europe: Mediterranean countries are strongly represented, while Baltic, Balkan, and Eastern European countries remain comparatively underrepresented. Driver categories are also shown to interact rather than operate in isolation. For example, policy instruments such as the Nitrates Directive have stimulated the development and adoption of fertiliser recovery and replacement technologies, illustrating how institutional drivers can influence technological and management responses relevant to soil health. By providing a standardised typology and evidence map, this study reduces conceptual fragmentation, identifies concrete regional and thematic gaps, and provides an empirical basis for more integrated soil health research, monitoring, and governance.
- Preprint
(2183 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 19 Dec 2026)
- CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4955', Susana Ferreira, 29 Oct 2026 reply
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4955', Roelof Zwaan, 12 Nov 2026
reply
The study presents a categorisation framework for different drivers of soil health and links these drivers to different soil health objectives within Europe. The work is novel and provides interesting insights in connectivity between drivers, regional bias in research and the complexity of factors influencing the soil health objectives. The manuscript is written in proper english and contains sufficient graphs and figures to present the results in a clear manner.
What follows are some generic comments, with more specific comments in the attached pdf.
- I noticed lot of repetition, especially in the introduction - with similar information being conveyed across multiple paragraphs. There were also some instances of repeated sentences in the result section that I noticed. I marked these in the pdf.
-The introduction doesn't necessarily follow a traditional structure - the last paragraph seems to introduce a new knowledge gap whereas the goal of the study was already introduced prior. I think it might help (also with avoiding repetition) to follow a very structurized approach for writing the introduction where the problem is properly introduced, knowledge gaps are identified and then the goal of the study and research questions are provided.
-It is unclear what the land-use categories they have chosen mean exactly, as there can be overlap between them - particularly between forest and nature.
-I am missing more detailed information on the panel of experts that was consulted in the standardisation of the drivers - does the knowledge base of these experts cover drivers within Europe or could drivers that are more regionally important have been overlooked?
-The term nature-based solutions in the paper is used in multiple instances where it does not refer to a nature-based solution. Either Nature-based solutions should be given their own driver, if there is enough evidence for that or a more generic term such as sustainable practices should be used. It should be clarified whether the original studies use the term NbS as well or whether this grouping was done within this study.
-The discussion, for a large part, repeats the results and can be made much shorter - focussing instead on the interesting interactions between drivers and SHO's or land uses.
-The limitations section in the methods can be merged with the section in the discussion which largely covers the same content
Data sets
Meta-analysis: Drivers of soil health across EU Shaswati Chowdhury, Maria von Post, Roger Roca Vallejo, Karen Naciph Mora, Jenni Hultman, Taina Pennanen, Antti-Jussi Lindroos, Katharina Helming, Silvia Frezzi https://doi.org/10.20387/zalf-a15w-f1kh
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 342 | 159 | 62 | 563 | 63 | 60 |
- HTML: 342
- PDF: 159
- XML: 62
- Total: 563
- BibTeX: 63
- EndNote: 60
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The manuscript addresses an important topic and provides a useful synthesis of the drivers of soil health across Europe. However, some aspects require further clarification:
Interpretation of results: The frequency with which drivers are mentioned in the literature should not be equated with their actual causal importance for soil health.
Numerical consistency: The reported number of studies on growing-season prolongation appears inconsistent with the country-level counts and should be clarified.
Driver classification: The criteria used to assign drivers to categories should be more clearly defined to ensure consistency and reproducibility.
Methodological transparency: More detailed reporting of the search, screening and coding procedures, including measures to ensure consistency between reviewers, would strengthen reproducibility.
Geographical gaps: Underrepresentation of certain countries in the literature should be interpreted cautiously, as it may reflect research coverage and data availability rather than necessarily indicating gaps in soil-health knowledge.
Addressing these points would strengthen the robustness and interpretation of this otherwise valuable synthesis.