Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-493
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-493
02 Mar 2026
 | 02 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Long-term Climatology of Vertical Profiles of Polarimetric Variables and Ice-microphysical Retrievals at X-band. Part I: Radar Calibration

Tobias Scharbach and Silke Trömel

Abstract. In a two-part series of papers, a climatology of quasi-vertical profiles (QVPs) of polarimetric variables and ice-microphysical retrievals such as ice water content, total number concentration and mean volume diameter is presented. QVPs are generated from plan position indicator scans at 18° elevation angle measured with the X-band radar located in the city of Bonn in western Germany between 2013 and 2023. They have been statistically analysed including error analysis with special emphasis on the characteristics of the melting layer and the dendritic growth layer. This long-term climatology improves the understanding of microphysical processes in stratiform cloud regimes and provides a reference for numerical weather prediction modellers to e.g. advance existing microphysical bulk paramerisation schemes.

While part two analyses and discusses the climatology, this first part of the series describes the prior thorough calibration of the radar reflectivity factor (ZH) and the differential reflectivity (ZDR). One method uses the relation between ZH and ZDR in light rain to calibrate ZH. Best fits are determined from simulated ZH and ZDR values obtained with T-matrix calculations for various temperatures and values of the width of the canting angle distribution using a large disdrometer dataset of drop size distributions measured over Germany (mostly Bonn). Since this ZH calibration technique strongly depends on the accuracy of ZDR and encountered deficiencies in the birdbath scan, QVPs in light rain have been used to calibrate ZDR. Obtained ZH offset values are validated and compared using both satellite information and self-consistency relationships including specific differential phase (KDP). The successful calibration of ZH is confirmed by the root-mean-square error (0.70 dBZ), the mean- absolute error (0.60 dBZ), and the mean-bias (-0.50 dBZ) compared to the offsets obtained from satellite information. Offsets calculated by applying self-consistency relations show larger discrepancies, which favours the suitability of the novel method.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Tobias Scharbach and Silke Trömel

Status: open (until 07 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Tobias Scharbach and Silke Trömel
Tobias Scharbach and Silke Trömel

Viewed

Total article views: 53 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
38 12 3 53 2 2
  • HTML: 38
  • PDF: 12
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 53
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Mar 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Mar 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 64 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 64 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
For the X-band radar in Bonn, the birdbath method has proven to be insufficient for calibrating differential reflectivity. This study raises awareness of the need for critically applying the birdbath method. A novel technique for calibrating the reflectivity factor is presented and compared with satellite measurements, serving as ground truth, and a known standard calibration method. The offset values agree well with the satellite and even exceed the accuracy of the standard calibration method.
Share