Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4928
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4928
30 Oct 2026
 | 30 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Regime-aware retrieval of lower-tropospheric stability and a sensitivity-weighted diagnostic of cross-site transferability over heterogeneous land surfaces

Yufei Chu, Jun A. Zhang, Guo Lin, Hanqin Guo, Lulin Xue, Weiwei Li, Hyeyum Hailey Shin, Min Deng, Lan Jin, and Flynn McGinnity

Abstract. Lower-tropospheric stability (LTS) regulates convective boundary-layer growth, low-cloud evolution, pollutant dispersion, and land–atmosphere coupling, yet continuous observations are scarce because thermodynamic profilers are sparse and expensive, and reanalysis products explain less than one-third of the observed variance in inversion strength even at well-instrumented sites. We retrieve continuous LTS at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains observatory from routine surface-flux measurements and Doppler-lidar-derived mixed-layer height, using a regime-aware, stage-partitioned framework established in earlier work. At the central facility over May 2016–December 2020 the retrieval reproduces observed LTS with a coefficient of determination of 0.78 and a mean absolute error of 2.39 K, and captures the full diurnal evolution of stability. The principal contribution is a diagnostic for judging when such a retrieval can be transferred to another site. Predictor-distribution differences, quantified by the Kullback–Leibler divergence, are weighted by SHapley Additive exPlanations sensitivities to form a single metric, ΔKL×|SHAP|. Applied to two extended facilities, the metric shows that distributional differences degrade transferability only where the retrieval is sensitive to the shifted predictor, and identifies cloud-base height, mixed-layer height, and thermodynamic predictors as the dominant contributors at the poorer-performing site. Gaussian perturbation experiments provide an independent fingerprint: monotonic error growth indicates a transferable relationship limited by random observational uncertainty, whereas a non-monotonic response indicates structural thermodynamic mismatch. Requiring only predictor distributions and model sensitivities, the diagnostic applies to any data-driven atmospheric retrieval.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Yufei Chu, Jun A. Zhang, Guo Lin, Hanqin Guo, Lulin Xue, Weiwei Li, Hyeyum Hailey Shin, Min Deng, Lan Jin, and Flynn McGinnity

Status: open (until 05 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Yufei Chu, Jun A. Zhang, Guo Lin, Hanqin Guo, Lulin Xue, Weiwei Li, Hyeyum Hailey Shin, Min Deng, Lan Jin, and Flynn McGinnity
Yufei Chu, Jun A. Zhang, Guo Lin, Hanqin Guo, Lulin Xue, Weiwei Li, Hyeyum Hailey Shin, Min Deng, Lan Jin, and Flynn McGinnity
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 31 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Atmospheric stability near the ground controls clouds, pollution and mixing, but is rarely measured continuously. We show it can be estimated from routine surface and boundary-layer measurements, and – more importantly – we introduce a way to tell in advance whether such an estimate will still work at a different location. The method identifies which measurements are responsible when it fails, and whether the failure is due to random noise or a genuine difference in local conditions.
Share