Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4834
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4834
07 Sep 2026
 | 07 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Landslide debris inundation risk and uncertainty from a process-based hazard model for the West Coast region of New Zealand

Kerry Leith and Volker Wichmann

Abstract. Regional landslide debris inundation risk assessments are commonly constrained by scenario-based formulations that require explicit enumeration of landslide sources and runout events, limiting scalability and introducing sensitivity to subjective modelling choices. This study presents a process-based framework for regional landslide debris inundation risk assessment that employs a flux-based hazard metric to quantify probability of inundation and mean annual property loss risk.

The approach builds on the Landslide Source-to-Inundation Process Model by coupling spatially distributed landslide sediment production with mass-conservative downslope routing, and converting resulting debris flux into probabilistic estimates of building damage. Risk is evaluated as a temporally integrated quantity arising from all feasible landslide sources, volumes, triggers, and return intervals, without reliance on discrete runout scenarios. We apply the method to the ~25,000 km2 West Coast region of New Zealand. Results indicate the aggregate rainfall-induced property loss corresponds to approximately 1.6 equivalent complete residential-building losses per year under present-day conditions. Under the RCP6 2081–2100 climate scenario, rainfall-induced residential APLR increases by approximately 50 %, assuming landslide sediment production increases in proportion to rainfall-induced susceptibility.

Uncertainty is quantified through parametric sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, and evaluation of topographic resolution effects. Combined uncertainty is estimated at approximately ±1.0 OOM at the 1-sigma-equivalent level for the regional 25 m model; a conservative ±1.25 OOM uncertainty is adopted for interpretation. This reduces substantially when higher-accuracy topography is employed. The framework provides a scalable and transparent basis for regional landslide risk analysis and supports risk-informed planning in landslide-prone regions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Kerry Leith and Volker Wichmann

Status: open (until 19 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Kerry Leith and Volker Wichmann
Kerry Leith and Volker Wichmann
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 07 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
We developed a method to estimate how often landslides affect the landscape damage buildings accross large regions. Applied to the 25,000 km2 West Coast of New Zealand, it suggests rainfall-triggered landslides cause losses equivalent to about 1.6 homes each year, with 50 % higher risk under future climate conditions. We calculate how uncertain our estimates are in order to improve confidence, and help with regional planning decisions.
Share