Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4826
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4826
25 Aug 2026
 | 25 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Solute Release from Floodplains during Distinct Types of Inundation Events: Insights from Field Experiments and Reactive Transport Simulations

Zach Perzan, Kristin Boye, John R. Bargar, and Kate Maher

Abstract. Floodplains exert profound control on catchment water quality by transiently storing, transforming, and releasing solutes and particulate matter as they flow through the river corridor. These dynamic environments are shaped by periodic floods that increase hydrologic connectivity, linking shallow floodplain soils to groundwater and surface water and driving abrupt shifts in solute mobility. While floodplain inundation is often assumed to flush accumulated solutes toward groundwater and surface water, floods can arise through several different mechanisms — including overbank flow, rising groundwater levels, and rainfall- or snowmelt-induced ponding — each of which likely has a distinct impact on solute transport. Here, we combine field observations with reactive transport simulations to evaluate how distinct forms of inundation impact solute mobilization from floodplains. Results from a dye infiltration experiment reveal that precipitation-driven, top-down inundation events (such as rainfall in excess of infiltration capacity) induce preferential flow through macropores. This floodwater bypasses the soil matrix and results in minimal solute exchange. In contrast, observations from a groundwater-driven, bottom-up flood show rapid increases in solute concentrations as groundwater rose into the soil profile and dissolved evaporites within the soil matrix. To generalize beyond these field observations, we use dual permeability reactive transport simulations to test how inundation type, magnitude, and timing affect net solute exchange between the soil and underlying aquifer. Simulations show that groundwater-driven, bottom-up floods drive a net gain of solutes from the aquifer to the floodplain. Top-down floods, on the other hand, lead to solute loss from the floodplain to the aquifer, but this loss can be outweighed by summer plant water demand, which limits downward percolation of floodwater. Collectively, these results reveal that floodplain inundation cannot be interpreted as a simple flushing process. Instead, net solute exchange depends on the type of inundation event, the extent of preferential flow, and the seasonal timing of flooding with respect to plant transpiration.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Zach Perzan, Kristin Boye, John R. Bargar, and Kate Maher

Status: open (until 06 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Zach Perzan, Kristin Boye, John R. Bargar, and Kate Maher
Zach Perzan, Kristin Boye, John R. Bargar, and Kate Maher
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 25 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Floods are often assumed to flush solutes from floodplains to streams, but our field experiments and model simulations show that this is not always true. Floods that infiltrate from the surface can bypass much of the soil by flowing along soil cracks and root channels, while floods that rise up from below import solutes into the soil. The amount of solute flushing also depends on the timing of inundation relative to plant growth; during the growing season, roots help retain solutes in the soil.
Share