the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Impact of the chemical regime on highly oxygenated molecule and secondary organic aerosol formation: Effects of varying the importance of NO, HO2·, RO2· reactions on α-pinene photooxidation products
Abstract. An important source of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) are highly oxygenated molecules (HOMs) formed by atmospheric oxidation of volatile organic compounds. HOM formation is governed by the fate of HOM peroxy radicals (RO₂·) which depends on the availability of reaction partners (RO₂·, HO₂·, NO) and on their overall lifetime – factors often insufficiently explored in laboratory studies.
We performed α-pinene photooxidation experiments systematically exploring these parameters and present the impacts on HOM and SOA formation within a generic framework explaining the changes in HOM production. Steady-state experiments were performed in the SAPHIR-STAR atmospheric simulation chamber. The reaction regime was shifted by increasing HO₂· and NO, separately and simultaneously, while keeping the α-pinene primary oxidation conditions constant. (NH₄)₂SO₄ particles were added to observe gas-phase HOM condensation and investigate product volatilities.
We find decreasing SOA formation potential when moving away from RO₂·-dominated regimes. One reason is the suppression of HOM accretion product formation from HOM-RO₂·+RO₂·. Alkoxy radicals (RO·) from RO₂·+RO₂· or RO₂·+NO play another important role. RO· are crucial intermediates in certain HOM formation pathways but also produce lower-mass, more fragmented HOM with higher volatility, decreasing SOA formation potential. Additionally, RO₂·+NO forms organic nitrates, which we show have higher volatility than other termination products. Our mechanistic considerations illustrate which factors impact the HOM product distribution and explain the reduced SOA formation through changes in HOM composition and volatility.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(1074 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(713 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 24 Sep 2026)