Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4772
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4772
18 Aug 2026
 | 18 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).

Assessing diabatic influences on extratropical cyclone development using complementary diagnostics

Svenja Christ, Tyler C. Leicht, Jennifer L. Catto, Jacob Maddison, Julian Quinting, and Joaquim G. Pinto

Abstract. Extratropical cyclones are a key driver of midlatitude weather variability, including high-impact events with heavy precipitation and severe wind gusts. Cyclone intensification results from the complex interplay of baroclinic dynamics and diabatic heating, the latter being closely linked to cloud-related processes within warm conveyor belts (WCBs). Focusing on four representative intense European cyclones, this study contrasts two commonly used methods — pressure tendency equation (PTE) and piecewise potential vorticity (PV) inversion — to assess the methodological uncertainty in quantifying the role of diabatic processes for cyclone intensification. The methods are complemented by a deep learning-based WCB identification diagnostic. Although for most cyclones PTE and PV inversion yield consistent results regarding the role of diabatic processes, substantial differences are found for at least one cyclone. Cyclones with strong diabatic heating contributions tend to be associated with enhanced low- to mid-level PV forcing. For two diabatically influenced cyclones, PV contributions are concentrated in the frontal circulation. In contrast, for one cyclone, the mid-level forcing is more strongly linked to shear in the jet region rather than diabatic heating. Overall, our results demonstrate the benefit of combining complementary diagnostic approaches to better constrain the contribution of diabatic processes to extratropical cyclone intensification. The clear link between the diagnostics highlights the potential of both methods for systematic evaluations of weather and climate models.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Svenja Christ, Tyler C. Leicht, Jennifer L. Catto, Jacob Maddison, Julian Quinting, and Joaquim G. Pinto

Status: open (until 29 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Svenja Christ, Tyler C. Leicht, Jennifer L. Catto, Jacob Maddison, Julian Quinting, and Joaquim G. Pinto
Svenja Christ, Tyler C. Leicht, Jennifer L. Catto, Jacob Maddison, Julian Quinting, and Joaquim G. Pinto
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 18 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
This study compares the pressure tendency equation (PTE) and piecewise potential vorticity (PV) inversion to assess methodological uncertainty in quantifying diabatic contributions to extratropical cyclone intensification for four high-impact European cyclones. For most cyclones, PTE and PV inversion yield consistent results regarding the role of diabatic processes, with cyclones with strong diabatic heating contributions tending to be associated with enhanced low- to mid-level PV forcing.
Share