the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Accurate and high-resolution measurements of UTLS water vapor by balloon-borne laser absorption spectroscopy
Abstract. Accurate and sustained monitoring of water vapor (H2O) in the upper troposphere-lower stratosphere (UTLS) is essential for quantifying its role in the atmospheric radiative balance, chemistry, and climate variability. However, in situ measurements in this region remain challenging due to the extremely low H2O concentrations, harsh environmental conditions, and strict payload limitations on meteorological balloon platforms. ALBATROSS is a compact (3.6 kg), balloon-borne mid-infrared laser absorption spectrometer developed to provide highly accurate, SI-traceable H2O measurements with high vertical resolution in the UTLS. Following recent comprehensive laboratory characterization, we present the first in-flight validation of ALBATROSS, based on seven balloon flights conducted between 2022 and 2026 from the meteorological observatories of Payerne, Switzerland (six flights) and Lindenberg, Germany (one flight). All flights included simultaneous measurements by a cryogenic frostpoint hygrometer (CFH) and a meteorological radiosonde (Vaisala RS41), with CFH operating either in a tandem-flight configuration or on the same payload as ALBATROSS. In the troposphere (up to 12 km altitude), the ALBATROSS retrieval agrees with both reference instruments within a mean relative difference of –2 ± 7 % with respect to RS41 and –1 ± 8 % with respect to CFH over nearly three orders of magnitude in H2O mixing ratio. Fine‑scale vertical structures and cirrus cloud layers are consistently resolved. In the stratosphere, following the implementation of an in-flight purging system to eliminate contamination from internal moisture sources, ALBATROSS achieves an agreement of 3 ± 10 % relative to CFH between 12 and 28 km altitude. An important advantage of laser absorption spectroscopy is demonstrated through observations of balloon-induced H2O spikes detected simultaneously by ALBATROSS and CFH in the stratosphere. These measurements reveal fast dynamic response of the laser spectrometer of ~1 s, corresponding to an effective vertical resolution of 5 m, compared to 3–4 s (15–20 m) for frostpoint hygrometry. Overall, these results demonstrate the robust performance of ALBATROSS under real atmospheric conditions and establish mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy as a reference-quality technique for balloon‑borne observations and long‑term monitoring of UTLS H2O.
- Preprint
(13769 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4732 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4762', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Sep 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4762', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Sep 2026
Review of the manuscript egusphere-2026-4762, entitled « Accurate and high-resolution measurements of UTLS water vapor by balloon-borne laser absorption spectroscopy » by Brunamonti et al.
The article describes in detail a new laser absorption hygrometer, under development since several years at EMPA (Switzerland). The instrument, ALBATROSS, was test flown under small weather balloon a couple of times and has been participating to the AQUAVIT-4 intercomparison campaign (in its earlier version) in 2022.
I particularly appreciate the sections « Technical challenges » and « Flight-by-flight performance summary », detailling all sources of contamination and a step-by-step discrimantion of outgassing sources. Such issue is a longstanding challenge for stratospheric water vapor measurements. I believe this is really informative for further developments conducted by other research groups.
The manuscript is weel written, I only have a couple of questions/comments:
Line 2, page 4 : « with a compact, monolithic segmented circular multipass cell » : What material is used for the SC-MPC ? Is it still aluminum as described in Tuzson et al., 2020 ? Did you test the optical stability (path length) in a thermal enclosure ?
Line 18-19, page 12 : Figure 3, flight F6 & F6 descent shows that there is a residual outgassing inherent to the flight chain during the end of the end that will be difficult to remove. The only option is to burst at much higher altitude so this 4 km contaminated layer does not preclude upper stratospheric measurements. This is a well-known problem, already pointed out in several papers since back in 1991 (Ovarlez, 1991) where the origin was unknown up to nowadays (Ghysels et al., 2024). In such, for scientific applications aiming to study stratospheric variability, it is highly desirable to use descent data for the analysis. It could be fair I guess to mention this in the « Flight F6 » paragraph.
Additionally, fortunately the flights occurred while Aura LMS was still in operation : comparing your measurements (and CFH) to MLS vertical profiles (not affected by outgassing) could help demonstrating that no residual outgassing is left.
Line 1, page 13 : you mention that the larger relative difference between ALBATROSS and CFH & RS 41 near 8-9 km for flight F1 and F4 is due to contamination : what is the source ?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4762-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 191 | 87 | 54 | 332 | 53 | 51 | 64 |
- HTML: 191
- PDF: 87
- XML: 54
- Total: 332
- Supplement: 53
- BibTeX: 51
- EndNote: 64
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Please find my review in the attached PDF.