the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Quantifying regional transport contributions and diagnosing ozone formation sensitivity: A trajectory informed machine learning study at background sites across China
Abstract. Surface ozone (O3) pollution in China is affected by transported pollutants, air mass pathways, local pollution conditions, meteorology, temporal variability, and stratospheric inputs, but their relative roles remain difficult to distinguish at background sites. Here we developed a nationwide trajectory informed machine learning framework to quantify model explained processes controlling hourly O3 at 76 background monitoring sites across China during 2015–2024. Hourly observations were integrated with 72 h HYSPLIT backward trajectories, high resolution gridded pollutant fields along trajectory endpoints, ERA5 meteorology, a CAMS stratospheric O3 tracer, and temporal predictors. XGBoost models showed robust performance, with a median test R2 of 0.853 across valid station year models. SHAP interpretation showed that trajectory pollutants were the dominant explanatory group, accounting for 56.4 % of the total model explained contribution, followed by ERA5 meteorology, local pollutants, temporal features, trajectory location and height, and stratospheric O3. During MDA8 O3 exceedance days (>160 mg m−3), trajectory pollutant contribution increased to 65.3 %, and further to 72.3 % during the peak 8 h window. This enhancement was mainly driven by trajectory O3, whose share within the trajectory pollutant group increased from 75.6 % to 89.3 %. OMI HCHO/NO2 ratios indicated that O3 formation was mainly VOC limited or transitional. Diurnal analysis further showed that maximum O3 was associated with local pollutant meteorology coupling, whereas higher minimum O3 reflected transport pathway and background structure. These results highlight the importance of transported O3 rich air masses in high O3 episodes at Chinese background sites.
- Preprint
(1988 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(285 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 20 Oct 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4705', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Sep 2026 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4705', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Sep 2026
reply
This manuscript presents a nationwide trajectory-informed machine learning analysis of surface ozone variability at 76 background monitoring sites across China during 2015-2024. By integrating ground observations, HYSPLIT backward trajectories, gridded pollutant fields, ERA5 meteorology, CAMS stratospheric ozone tracers, and OMI HCHO/NO2 products, the study provides a useful framework for examining the relative roles of transported pollutants, local pollution, meteorology, temporal variability, pathway characteristics, and stratospheric influence. The topic is timely and relevant to ACP, and the manuscript is generally well organized. The combination of trajectory-resolved pollutant information and SHAP-based group interpretation is interesting and provides potentially valuable insight into high-O3 episodes at background sites across China.
Overall, I find the study scientifically meaningful and potentially suitable for publication after minor revisions. My comments below are intended to help improve clarity, methodological transparency, and interpretation.
1.The manuscript carefully mentions “model-explained contribution” in several places, which is appropriate because SHAP values quantify the contribution of predictors to model predictions rather than direct physical source apportionment. However, terms such as “source contribution” still appear in some section titles, figure captions, and discussion text. To avoid possible confusion with chemical transport model source apportionment, I suggest consistently using terms such as “SHAP-derived contribution”, “model-explained contribution”, or “process-related explanatory contribution”. This is a relatively simple wording revision but would make the interpretation more rigorous.
2.The trajectory-resolved pollutant predictors are central to the study. It would be helpful to provide a concise description of the gridded pollutant dataset, including its spatial and temporal resolution, data source, and whether it is observation-derived, reanalysis-based, or model-derived. This information may already be in the Supplement, but adding one short sentence in Section 2.1 or 2.2 would make the method easier to follow.
3.The sensitivity diagnosis based on OMI HCHO/NO2 is a useful independent component of the study. The manuscript states that six binning schemes were tested and that final peak_FNR and transition bounds were summarized as robust values. Please specify whether these final values were calculated as the median, mean, or another statistic across the six binning schemes. This small clarification would improve reproducibility.
4.Several figures contain important grouped SHAP categories and thresholds, but readers may need to return to the main text to understand all abbreviations and sample restrictions. I suggest adding brief definitions in the captions for terms such as “trajectory pollutants”, “trajectory location/height”, “R2 ³ 0.5”, “full exceedance days”, and “peak 8 h window”. This would improve readability without requiring new analysis.
5.The finding that trajectory O3 dominates the trajectory-pollutant group is important. To make the interpretation more balanced, the authors may add one short statement acknowledging that trajectory O3 reflects both transported O3-rich air masses and temporal-spatial continuity of O3 fields, especially at short trajectory ages. This does not weaken the result, but it helps define the physical meaning of the trajectory-informed predictor more carefully.
6.The manuscript is generally understandable, but some expressions could be improved for ACP style. For example, “source contribution” could be harmonized as noted above; “transported O3 rich air masses” may be written as “transported O3-rich air masses”; and spacing around citations and units should be checked throughout. These are minor editorial issues.
In summary, this manuscript addresses an important question in ozone pollution diagnosis and provides a useful nationwide perspective on background-site O3 variability in China. The analysis is comprehensive, and the results are potentially valuable for understanding the role of transported O3-rich air masses during high-O3 episodes. I recommend publication after minor revisions addressing the points above.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4705-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 247 | 83 | 32 | 362 | 44 | 31 | 30 |
- HTML: 247
- PDF: 83
- XML: 32
- Total: 362
- Supplement: 44
- BibTeX: 31
- EndNote: 30
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Please find the comments in the supplement