Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4673
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4673
30 Sep 2026
 | 30 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Multi-level tower estimates of friction velocity in the Taklimakan Desert: sensitivity to height selection, wind direction, and causal controls

Yifei Wang, Wen Huo, Mayibaier Maihamuti, and Yisilamu Wulayin

Abstract. Friction velocity (u*) underpins estimates of dust emission, but profile-derived values may depend on measurement height, wind direction and site conditions. We analysed multilevel tower observations from Tazhong (TZ) and Xiaotang (XT) during March–July 2024, together with ERA5 data and convergent cross mapping (CCM). TZ had greater terrain ruggedness than XT (TRI, 3.0 versus 1.4) and a slightly higher mean daily u* (0.24 versus 0.21 m s−1). The monthly maximum frequency of hourly u* above 0.30 m s−1 was 57.23 % at TZ and 48.46 % at XT. Across seven height configurations, H01 (1, 2, 4, 10 and 20 m) gave the lowest RMSE and highest Pearson correlation for both fitting approaches. Against an ERA5-derived neutral-profile reference, finite-L H01 fits had RMSEs of 0.186 and 0.191 m s−1 at TZ and XT, respectively, with correlations of 0.195 and 0.261. Neutral-only H01 fits had RMSEs of 0.118 and 0.129 m s−1 and correlations of 0.396 and 0.417. Directional differences were more pronounced at TZ, where the high-level H05 configuration generally produced larger median u* than lower-level configurations across wind sectors. CCM cross-map skill for 10 m wind speed was similar at both sites (maximum ρ = 0.24), whereas net-radiation skill was higher at TZ (0.44) than XT (0.25). Surface–air temperature contrast showed a similar site difference (0.38 versus 0.22), while air-temperature contrast was comparable (0.40 at both sites). These results show that height configuration and wind direction shape profile-derived estimates, while thermal associations vary between sites.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Yifei Wang, Wen Huo, Mayibaier Maihamuti, and Yisilamu Wulayin

Status: open (until 11 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Yifei Wang, Wen Huo, Mayibaier Maihamuti, and Yisilamu Wulayin
Yifei Wang, Wen Huo, Mayibaier Maihamuti, and Yisilamu Wulayin
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 30 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
The 1–20 m measurement combination yielded the most consistent wind estimates among those tested. Higher-level measurements generally produced larger estimates, particularly at the dune-surrounded site, where results also varied more with wind direction. Surface heating was more closely related to wind strength there than at the flatter site. These findings show that measurement height and local terrain influence how tower-based wind observations should be interpreted.
Share