Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4645
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4645
01 Sep 2026
 | 01 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

The role of secondary ice production in shaping the microphysical evolution of orographic clouds: A RAMS-ICLAMS modeling study

Ioannis Chaniotis, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Romanos Foskinis, Marilena Gidarakou, Maria Gini, Platon Patlakas, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Alexandros Papagiannis, Elissavet Bossioli, Nicole Clerx, Alexis Berne, Helena Flocas, and Athanasios Nenes

Abstract. Secondary ice production (SIP) strongly influences ice crystal number concentrations (ICNCs) and cloud microphysical properties, with important implications for radiative forcing, thermodynamics, cloud evolution, and precipitation. Here, we investigate four SIP mechanisms—rime splintering, collisional breakup, rain droplet shattering during freezing, and sublimation breakup—in the Integrated Community Limited Area Modeling System, a specialized version of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS-ICLAMS), during winter storms observed in November–December 2024 as part of the Cleancloud Helmos OrograPhic sIte experimeNt (CHOPIN). Activating SIP increases ICNCs by two to three orders of magnitude and enhances ice water content by up to a factor of 2–3, substantially modifying cloud structure, including a 25–35 % reduction in liquid water path and a doubling of ice water path. These changes improve agreement with observed radar signatures and precipitation patterns and alter the amount of precipitation reaching the ground. Among the represented mechanisms, collisional breakup is dominant, followed by rime splintering. Sublimation breakup is locally intense but at least one order of magnitude weaker, while droplet shattering is the weakest and is mainly activated in regions rich in raindrops. The simulated systems encompass synoptic-scale, convective, and stratiform clouds, including snowfall-producing and seeder–feeder configurations. These results highlight the importance of representing SIP—particularly collisional breakup and rime splintering—for realistic simulations of diverse orographic clouds and precipitation in weather- and climate-scale models.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ioannis Chaniotis, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Romanos Foskinis, Marilena Gidarakou, Maria Gini, Platon Patlakas, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Alexandros Papagiannis, Elissavet Bossioli, Nicole Clerx, Alexis Berne, Helena Flocas, and Athanasios Nenes

Status: open (until 13 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ioannis Chaniotis, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Romanos Foskinis, Marilena Gidarakou, Maria Gini, Platon Patlakas, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Alexandros Papagiannis, Elissavet Bossioli, Nicole Clerx, Alexis Berne, Helena Flocas, and Athanasios Nenes

Data sets

CleanCloud CHOPIN - radar data & code N. Clerx et al. https://zenodo.org/records/21245825

Ioannis Chaniotis, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Romanos Foskinis, Marilena Gidarakou, Maria Gini, Platon Patlakas, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Alexandros Papagiannis, Elissavet Bossioli, Nicole Clerx, Alexis Berne, Helena Flocas, and Athanasios Nenes
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
This study implements three secondary ice production mechanisms in the RAMS-ICLAMS model to better represent mixed-phase clouds. Validated against CHOPIN campaign data and for two characteristic alpine cloud formations, these mechanisms improve ice crystal concentrations, cloud structure, and reflectivity. However, opposing precipitation responses have been predicted, highlighting a non linear response, which aligns with independent previous findings.
Share