Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4621
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4621
12 Aug 2026
 | 12 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf).

Bank Pull or Bar Push: Who Leads the Dance of Meander Migration?

Gustavo W. Nagel, Stephen Darby, Julian Leyland, and Eli D. Lazarus

Abstract. Despite significant advances in the study of meandering rivers, the precise mechanisms by which erosion and sedimentation interact to drive meander migration remain poorly understood. Two long-standing competing theories attempt to explain this interaction: one suggests that inner-bank sediment deposition precedes outer-bank erosion (bar push), while the other posits that outer-bank erosion initiates inner-bank sedimentation (bank pull). To date, empirical research addressing which of these mechanisms dominates in real-world environments has predominantly focused on a small number of bends and at limited temporal scales. In this paper, we identify analyse the occurrence of bank pull versus bar push across 4,923 river bends worldwide. We estimated outer-bank erosion and inner-bank sedimentation rates using a 38-year time series of Landsat data, from which classifications of bank pull and bar push were derived through Dynamic Cross-Correlation analysis. Of the 4,923 bends analyzed, 20 % were classified as bank pull dominated, 16 % as bar push dominated, whilst the remaining 63 % showed no clear migration signal. We also identified river characteristics that control the relative frequency of push versus pull migrating bends. Our findings indicate that vegetated bends, with higher soil compactness surrounded by sandy substrates and situated in rivers with slower flow velocities, are more likely to exhibit bend migration via bar push, where sediment deposition along the inner bank plays a dominant role. In contrast, less densely vegetated rivers with higher flow velocities and lower soil compactness show a higher occurrence of bends migrating via bank pull. This means that most bar-push migrating bends are located in densely vegetated tropical environments, with bar pull tending to dominate in other regions. This study represents the first quasi-global empirical framework capable of distinguishing the temporal sequencing of erosion and sedimentation across thousands of river bends using long-term satellite observations, providing valuable insights that could be used to improve river dynamics modelling and inform more effective river management strategies.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Gustavo W. Nagel, Stephen Darby, Julian Leyland, and Eli D. Lazarus

Status: open (until 23 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Gustavo W. Nagel, Stephen Darby, Julian Leyland, and Eli D. Lazarus
Gustavo W. Nagel, Stephen Darby, Julian Leyland, and Eli D. Lazarus
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 12 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Who leads the dance of meandering rivers? To answer this question, we analyzed almost four decades of satellite observations from 4,923 river bends worldwide. We found that rivers can begin to change through either erosion or sediment deposition, with each mechanism being associated with different environmental conditions. These findings improve our understanding of how rivers evolve and help predict future river change.
Share