Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4603
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4603
24 Aug 2026
 | 24 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Tall tower eddy covariance campaign reveals complex emission patterns for carbonyl sulfide

Jesse Juhani Soininen, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Stavros Stagakis, Ara Cho, Betty Molinier, Pascal Rubli, Rainer Hilland, Natascha Kljun, and Leena Järvi

Abstract. Carbonyl sulfide (COS) is a useful tracer of gross primary productivity (GPP), but the magnitude and variability of anthropogenic COS emissions in urban environments remain poorly constrained.

COS fluxes were investigated in Zurich, Switzerland, using tall-tower eddy covariance (EC) measurements as part of the ICOS Cities project from August 2022 to April 2023. Source-area variability was analysed using the Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP) model, and compared with biogenic COS fluxes simulated by the Simple Biosphere 4 (SiB4) model.

Zurich acted as a net sink of COS throughout most of the campaign (median −4.4 pmol m-2 s-1). The most vegetated south-western sector exhibited approximately three times the COS uptake of the south-eastern sector (−6.7 and −1.9 pmol m-2 s-1, respectively), while the south-eastern sector exhibited the weakest uptake, consistent with stronger anthropogenic fluxes. Footprint-weighted land-cover analysis showed that spatial variability in COS exchange reflected the balance between vegetation uptake and anthropogenic fluxes, with the latter masking the biospheric signal in densely built sectors. SiB4 reproduced the seasonal evolution of COS exchange but underestimated the sink following the preceding compound drought event and during an exceptionally warm winter, highlighting limitations in representing stomatal conductance and urban vegetation.

These results demonstrate both the potential and the challenges of using COS as a tracer of urban GPP. Improved anthropogenic COS emission inventories, ecosystem models, and urban flux observations are needed to improve COS-based estimates of urban carbon uptake.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jesse Juhani Soininen, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Stavros Stagakis, Ara Cho, Betty Molinier, Pascal Rubli, Rainer Hilland, Natascha Kljun, and Leena Järvi

Status: open (until 05 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jesse Juhani Soininen, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Stavros Stagakis, Ara Cho, Betty Molinier, Pascal Rubli, Rainer Hilland, Natascha Kljun, and Leena Järvi
Jesse Juhani Soininen, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Stavros Stagakis, Ara Cho, Betty Molinier, Pascal Rubli, Rainer Hilland, Natascha Kljun, and Leena Järvi
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 24 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Carbonyl sulfide is increasingly used to estimate how much carbon dioxide plants absorb from the atmosphere, but this is difficult in cities because human activities also emit this gas. We measured its exchange between the atmosphere and the urban area of Zurich and found that vegetation remained the main sink, while emissions from human activities reduced this uptake in densely built areas. These results improve the interpretation of urban carbon exchange.
Share