Preprints
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23627
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23627
17 Aug 2026
 | 17 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Maximum updraft velocity beyond CAPE: the role of boundary layer dynamics and pressure perturbations

Bety Pechacova, Alejandro Casallas, Tom Beucler, Lokahith Agasthya, and Caroline Muller

Abstract. Deep convective updraft velocities play a key role in the Earth's climate system, influencing precipitation extremes, lightning, and the planetary energy budget. While Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) is widely used to explain maximum updraft velocity (wmax), CAPE is an imperfect predictor as updrafts are also influenced by entrainment, boundary layer dynamics, pressure perturbations, and condensate loading. However, the relative importance of these processes and how they interact to set wmax in individual clouds remains unclear. Here, we use equation learning to identify compact, physically interpretable relationships linking environmental and in-cloud conditions to wmax in individual tracked clouds across idealized radiative–convective equilibrium regimes spanning a range of sea surface temperatures and radiative cooling rates. For pre-storm prediction, CAPE and local mean boundary layer vertical velocity (wbl) together explain nearly half the variance in wmax across regimes (R2=0.47). While CAPE captures regime-mean differences, it has little predictive value within a single simulation. wbl is essential for capturing cloud-to-cloud variability, including the suppression of wmax even at high CAPE values. At the time of peak intensity, a simple approximate Bernoulli-like invariant combining maximum pressure perturbation and maximum cloud condensate explains 89 % of the variance (R2=0.89). The tight link between wmax and pressure perturbation supports the sticky thermals hypothesis and highlights the importance of dynamic pressure effects, often neglected in updraft theories. These results highlight wbl as an important regulator of convective intensity alongside CAPE, and demonstrate that dynamic pressure plays an important role within individual updrafts.

Share
Bety Pechacova, Alejandro Casallas, Tom Beucler, Lokahith Agasthya, and Caroline Muller

Status: open (until 28 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Bety Pechacova, Alejandro Casallas, Tom Beucler, Lokahith Agasthya, and Caroline Muller

Data sets

Code and data for: Maximum updraft velocity beyond CAPE: the role of boundary layer dynamics and pressure perturbation B. Pechacova et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21474646

Model code and software

Code and data for: Maximum updraft velocity beyond CAPE: the role of boundary layer dynamics and pressure perturbation B. Pechacova et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21474646

Bety Pechacova, Alejandro Casallas, Tom Beucler, Lokahith Agasthya, and Caroline Muller
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 17 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
We use high-resolution simulations and data-driven equation discovery to find physically interpretable equations for the maximum updraft velocity in deep convective clouds. Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) alone has limited predictive power, but adding pre-storm boundary-layer motion greatly improves predictions. At peak intensity, updraft velocity is closely tied to pressure and latent heating effects, highlighting the often neglected role of dynamic pressure in updrafts.
Share