Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4469
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4469
07 Aug 2026
 | 07 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Deriving Subsurface Stormflow Mechanisms with Isotopes and ERT

Jonas Pyschik, Veronica Cordero, Jakob Wilk, Veronika Lechner, Emanuel Thoenes, Stefan Achleitner, Bernhard Kohl, Markus Weiler, and Stefan Hergarten

Abstract. Subsurface stormflow (SSF) is a dominant process in the generation of runoff in many catchments. However, the mechanisms by which new event water triggers the activation and release of stored pre-event water are not well understood. To identify the flow paths and mechanisms governing SSF generation, we conducted a controlled sprinkling experiment using deuterium- labeled water alongside time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), groundwater monitoring and soil core sampling at two trenched hillslopes in the Black Forest, Germany. Water was applied for three hours, with the supply switching to deuterated water halfway through the experiment. Both hillslopes responded rapidly, with event runoff coefficients of approximately 0.6, and tracer breakthrough occurred at the trenches within 7–18 minutes of application, even at depths greater than 70 cm. However, post-irrigation soil cores detected the tracer only in the uppermost 20 cm of the soil matrix, where approximately 45 % of the labeled water remained stored. Time-lapse ERT revealed that the wetting front was largely confined to the upper 0.2–1.5 m; meanwhile, the deeper, near-saturated zone exhibited negligible resistivity change despite sustained lateral discharge as measured at the trenches.

Together, these observations suggest the presence of a dual-domain flow system, whereby a small proportion of event water bypasses the matrix via vertically and laterally connected preferential pathways. Meanwhile, the majority of SSF consists of pre-event water, which is mobilized by pressure-driven (piston) displacement within the saturated zone. Subsequent natural rainfall remobilized the stored tracer, raising the cumulative recovery rate to approximately 30 % within one month, thereby confirming the soil matrix to be both a sink and a delayed source of event water.

Competing interests: One of the Co-Authors (Markus Weiler) is on the editorial Board of HESS

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jonas Pyschik, Veronica Cordero, Jakob Wilk, Veronika Lechner, Emanuel Thoenes, Stefan Achleitner, Bernhard Kohl, Markus Weiler, and Stefan Hergarten

Status: open (until 18 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jonas Pyschik, Veronica Cordero, Jakob Wilk, Veronika Lechner, Emanuel Thoenes, Stefan Achleitner, Bernhard Kohl, Markus Weiler, and Stefan Hergarten
Jonas Pyschik, Veronica Cordero, Jakob Wilk, Veronika Lechner, Emanuel Thoenes, Stefan Achleitner, Bernhard Kohl, Markus Weiler, and Stefan Hergarten
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 07 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
When it rains, much of the water reaching a stream has been stored in the soil for a long time, but why was unclear. We sprinkled two forested slopes with labelled water and used electrical imaging to watch it move. Only a small share moved quickly to the slope base; most of the outflow was older water pushed out by the pressure of the new rain. Much of the new water stayed in the topsoil and was released weeks later, affecting how soils carry nutrients and pollutants to streams.
Share