Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4445
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4445
12 Aug 2026
 | 12 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Warming-induced agricultural nitrous oxide emissions can offset mitigation benefits of fertiliser management

Jize Jiang, Lenny H. E. Winkel, Andrea Stenke, Magdalena Necpalova, Moritz Laub, Iris Feigenwinter, Nina Buchmann, and Johan Six

Abstract. Agriculture is the dominant source of anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O), a potent greenhouse gas with a high global warming potential. In Switzerland, substantial changes in fertiliser use alongside climatic conditions have occurred over the past four decades, yet the relative contributions of management practices versus environmental change to long-term N2O emission trends remain incompletely understood. Here, we applied the biogeochemical model DayCent at 1 km resolution across Switzerland, integrating spatially explicit datasets on climate, soil properties and agricultural management, to quantify N2O emissions for the period 1981–2020 from croplands and grasslands and attribute emission changes to management versus climate drivers. Simulated national N2O emissions from agricultural soils declined by roughly 5 % from 4.0 to 3.8 kt N yr⁻¹ between the 1980s and 2010s, primarily due to a 25 % reduction in N fertiliser use. Our attribution simulations suggested that under real climate conditions, such a decrease in fertiliser N inputs (–25 %) over the period studied lowered emissions by 15.2 % in croplands and by 12.0 % in grasslands (including permanent meadows and pastures, and high alpine summer pastures). However, compared to a control scenario (in the absence of climate change), rising temperatures over the past 40 years offset these gains, increasing emissions by 5.7 % in croplands and 13.6 % in grasslands. These results show that warming-induced N2O emissions partially negate mitigation from improved fertiliser management, highlighting the need for integrated agricultural N2O mitigation strategies that are resilient to future warming.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jize Jiang, Lenny H. E. Winkel, Andrea Stenke, Magdalena Necpalova, Moritz Laub, Iris Feigenwinter, Nina Buchmann, and Johan Six

Status: open (until 23 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jize Jiang, Lenny H. E. Winkel, Andrea Stenke, Magdalena Necpalova, Moritz Laub, Iris Feigenwinter, Nina Buchmann, and Johan Six
Jize Jiang, Lenny H. E. Winkel, Andrea Stenke, Magdalena Necpalova, Moritz Laub, Iris Feigenwinter, Nina Buchmann, and Johan Six
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 12 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
We studied how fertiliser management and a warming climate affect nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils in Switzerland over the past fourty years. Using computer simulations and nationwide data, we found that lower fertiliser use reduced emissions, but rising temperatures cancelled part of these mitigations. The results show a trade-off between mitigation actions and environmental-driven feedback, highlighting future efforts must also account for the effects of a changing climate.
Share