Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4441
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4441
28 Jul 2026
 | 28 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Assessment of tomography-derived three-dimensional cloud information and its suitability for downstream applications

Alessia Boccalatte, Yves-Marie Saint-Drenan, Benoît Gschwind, and Gabriel Chesnoiu

Abstract. Meteorological geostationary satellites carry passive imagers that provide multispectral observations over a large fraction of the Earth disk every 5–15 min. Cloud properties retrieved from these observations are primarily two-dimensional, as they are inferred from top-of-atmosphere radiances, and contain only limited information on vertical cloud structure. Recent SEVIRI-CloudSat tomography studies have shown that it is possible to infer CloudSat-like three-dimensional cloud structure from multispectral passive imagery. The main open question is therefore no longer feasibility of such approach, but the reliability of the reconstructed cloud information for downstream applications. The present study addresses this gap through a systematic performance evaluation of a SEVIRI-CloudSat tomography method on an independent year-long (2019) dataset of 17,110 scenes. The analysis assesses the fidelity of the estimated reflectivity, but also evaluates cloud occurrence, cloud geometry, vertically aggregated summaries derived from the 3D information, and their dependence on different variables. Scene-wise reflectivity RMSE over all CloudSat-valid voxels, including cloudy and clear-sky voxels is consistent with previous studies (2.76 dBZ). However, evaluation restricted to radar-detectable cloudy voxels yields a much larger median RMSE (14.48 dBZ) and bias (-11.16 dBZ), indicating systematic attenuation of moderate and strong echoes. Cloudy-voxel fraction is only weakly biased (-2.0 %), whereas cloudy-column fraction is underestimated by -17.4 %, consistent with missed observed-cloudy columns (POD = 0.63) and few false detections (FAR = 0.031). Cloud top and base heights remain informative when evaluated only where cloud geometry is defined in both observation and prediction (about 60 % of observed-cloudy columns) with median errors of 1.38 and 1.41 km. The scene-level vertical cloud centroid provides a complementary aggregate summary, with 96 % cloudy-scene recall, r = 0.89, and an RMSE of 1.04 km, while 97.4 % of observed multilayer columns collapse to single-layer reconstructions. The results show that SEVIRI-CloudSat tomography is limited in resolving fine-scale vertical structure and multilayer organization, but remains informative for bulk descriptors such as cloud fraction, vertical cloud centroid, and cloud top and base heights.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Alessia Boccalatte, Yves-Marie Saint-Drenan, Benoît Gschwind, and Gabriel Chesnoiu

Status: open (until 02 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Alessia Boccalatte, Yves-Marie Saint-Drenan, Benoît Gschwind, and Gabriel Chesnoiu
Alessia Boccalatte, Yves-Marie Saint-Drenan, Benoît Gschwind, and Gabriel Chesnoiu
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 28 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Satellites that frequently observe large regions cannot directly see how clouds are arranged vertically. We tested whether a machine-learning method can reconstruct this three-dimensional structure by combining geostationary images with radar measurements. The method captured the broad height and amount of cloud, but smoothed strong signals and often lost separate cloud layers. It is therefore useful for broad cloud organisation, but not for fine vertical details.
Share