Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4341
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4341
17 Aug 2026
 | 17 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Generative reconstruction of high-resolution historical climate fields from station observations

Jie Chao, Qi Liu, Hongming Yan, Zhenlu Liu, Jin Xu, Shuojie Gao, Zihang Han, Hang Su, Ziniu Xiao, Anlai Sun, and Baoxiang Pan

Abstract. Reconstructing complete, high-resolution daily meteorological fields over multidecadal periods from station observations is severely underdetermined: stations are sparse, unevenly distributed, and temporally inconsistent, especially over complex terrain. Because this ill-posedness requires prior assumptions, the choice of prior determines how well extremes are preserved. Conventional products, whether interpolation, multi-source fusion, or reanalysis, rely on prescribed background-error covariances that attenuate localized extremes as coverage declines. We introduce Generative REconstruction (GRE), a sequential assimilation framework that replaces prescribed covariances with a generative prior learned from satellite-era gridded fields. The prior, a diffusion model trained jointly on precipitation, pressure, wind, and temperature, encodes multivariate spatial structure including heavy-tailed extremes. At each step, posterior sampling conditions the prior on available stations and a forecast background, producing an ensemble whose spread reflects observational coverage. Applied over Southwest China (1951–2024), GRE yields daily 0.1° ensemble reconstructions of all four variables. Conditioned on 80 % of stations, GRE achieves R = 0.93 and RMSE = 5.8 mm/day for daily precipitation versus 0.69 and 7.1 for the baseline product, recovering rather than smoothing localized peaks. The joint prior propagates observational information across variables, constraining fields not directly observed. Over three decades, reconstructed precipitation extremes remain consistent with the reference climatology while ensemble spread contracts as gauges densify, evidencing calibrated long-term uncertainty. The forecast background adds most value under sparse coverage and persistent synoptic conditions, maintaining bounded physically consistent uncertainty throughout the early record.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jie Chao, Qi Liu, Hongming Yan, Zhenlu Liu, Jin Xu, Shuojie Gao, Zihang Han, Hang Su, Ziniu Xiao, Anlai Sun, and Baoxiang Pan

Status: open (until 12 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jie Chao, Qi Liu, Hongming Yan, Zhenlu Liu, Jin Xu, Shuojie Gao, Zihang Han, Hang Su, Ziniu Xiao, Anlai Sun, and Baoxiang Pan
Jie Chao, Qi Liu, Hongming Yan, Zhenlu Liu, Jin Xu, Shuojie Gao, Zihang Han, Hang Su, Ziniu Xiao, Anlai Sun, and Baoxiang Pan
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 17 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Scientists need daily weather maps over decades to study extremes, but observations are sparse and uneven. Existing methods fill gaps by averaging nearby data, which smooths intense local events like heavy rain. We instead train a model on modern data to learn realistic patterns. It reconstructs past days using available observations and links days together. Repeating this produces both best estimates and uncertainty, improving accuracy and capturing extremes.
Share