the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Ent Köppen-Geiger v1.0, a software tool for generating Earth System Model global vegetation boundary conditions for alternative climates
Abstract. We used the Köppen-Geiger biome-climate classification scheme to produce a software tool for predicting global maps of vegetation boundary conditions (VBCs) (soil and plant type cover fractions, canopy heights, annual maximum and monthly leaf area index) for Earth System Model (ESM) simulations of vegetation-atmosphere coupling in alternative climates. A modern Köppen-Geiger biome map derived from observed mean monthly climatology (2001–2010) was used as a mask to characterize statistics of contemporaneous satellite-observed VBCs categorized into the 12 plant functional types (PFTs) of the Ent Terrestrial Biosphere Model. A lookup table (LUT) of these VBCs was then constructed tabulating VBCs for each Köppen-Geiger class. For paleo-vegetation back to the Cretaceous, additional algorithms were designed to replace grasses and deciduous trees with time-relevant cover types. To evaluate the efficacy of the lookup table and paleo-vegetation algorithms, we conducted both modern and Cretaceous climate simulations with the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies ESM ModelE-2.1 and its generalized planetary version. Climate simulations for the modern, 2001–2010, using the LUT-generated VBCs showed simulated climate to have no significant difference from using the original satellite-derived VBCs. For the Cretaceous Thermal Maximum, given a preliminary simulated climate having bare soil for the land surfaces, predicted maps of cover types largely capture the vegetation type patterns compared to fossil reconstructions, while reflecting a high latitude cold bias of the simulated climate. The "Ent Köppen-Geiger" v1.0 software tool is made available for community updates and studies with asynchronous vegetation-climate model coupling for past to future climates.
- Preprint
(2442 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(71738 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 26 Oct 2026)
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4262 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 22 Sep 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Nancy Kiang, 22 Sep 2026
reply
We can change the section named "Data sets and codes" to "Codes and data availability".
Could you please clarify why Zenodo is not considered an appropriate repository? Are you looking at the last version of the manuscript that was approved by one of your editors for submission? It contained in that section: "The data sets and scripts for generating the Köppen-Geiger-based lookup tables of VBCs are archived at zenodo.org, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17917285 (Kiang et al., 2026). "
All codes and data sets necessary to reproduce the paper results are in that Zenodo link, with README files on what packages of R and python to install.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4262-AC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on AC1', Nancy Kiang, 22 Sep 2026
reply
In addition, all codes in that Zenodo link can be used by any user to apply for their own purposes. Is it user-ready.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4262-AC2 -
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 23 Sep 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, your reply does not address the outstanding issues. The Zenodo repository that you have provided does not contain essential code and data used in your work, or at least I have not found it there. For example, it does not include the exact version of the NASA GISS model used, neither the ERA5 data. Also, the NASA sites that you cite in your document to get access to the data are not acceptable repositories according to the policy of the journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4262-CEC2 -
AC3: 'Reply on CEC2', Nancy Kiang, 23 Sep 2026
reply
These are the items in Zenodo that you are looking for:
S11_ModelE_code_rundecks.tar.gz - The NASA GISS ESM ModelE codes and rundecks used.
S12_ROCKE3D_code_rundeck.tar.gz - The ROCKE-3D codes and rundeck used.
They appear for me when I search on "doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17917285" that was given in the manuscript:
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4262-AC3 -
AC4: 'Reply on AC3', Nancy Kiang, 23 Sep 2026
reply
I see we neglected to include the ERA5 data. However, these data are publicly available. Do you still need up to upload those data?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4262-AC4
-
AC4: 'Reply on AC3', Nancy Kiang, 23 Sep 2026
reply
-
AC5: 'Reply on CEC2', Nancy Kiang, 23 Sep 2026
reply
The NASA sites are not necessary to access the data, since the data are included in the Zenodo repository.
However, we document that users can download these same data if they wish to have just the code and only obtain the data as necessary. We can remove mention of the NASA repository if necessary.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4262-AC5
-
AC3: 'Reply on CEC2', Nancy Kiang, 23 Sep 2026
reply
-
AC2: 'Reply on AC1', Nancy Kiang, 22 Sep 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Nancy Kiang, 22 Sep 2026
reply
Data sets
Ent Köppen-Geiger LUT Tool v1.0 Nancy Y. Kiang, Cheuk Yin James Lui, Linda Sohl, Scott Guzewich https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17917285
Model code and software
Ent Köppen-Geiger LUT Tool v1.0 Nancy Y. Kiang, Cheuk Yin James Lui, Linda Sohl, Scott Guzewich https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17917285
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 145 | 53 | 27 | 225 | 24 | 32 | 28 |
- HTML: 145
- PDF: 53
- XML: 27
- Total: 225
- Supplement: 24
- BibTeX: 32
- EndNote: 28
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
First, your manuscript does not contain a "Code and Data Availability" section. Instead, in the current version of your manuscript you have included a section 5 called "Data sets and code", which does not provide suitable repositories for all the code and data used in your work, which includes all the training and output data, code developed and used, and the GISS Model.
I am sorry, but this is something forbidden by our policy, and your manuscript should have never been accepted for Discussions and peer review given such non compliance with it. Our policy clearly states that all the code and data necessary to replicate a manuscript must be published openly and freely to anyone before submission in a suitable repository. The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, publish your code and data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy.
Later, if the Topical Editor decides to continue with the review or publication process of your manuscript and you are requested to upload a new version of it, then The 'Code and Data Availability’ section of your manuscript must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor