Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4222
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4222
30 Jul 2026
 | 30 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Evaluating the performance of a numerical weather prediction model for precipitation and temperature in Luxembourg and the Greater Region: insights from WRF and WRFDA 3D-VAR

Haseeb ur Rehman, Felicia Norma Rebecca Teferle, Addisu Hunegnaw, Rohith Muraleedharan Thundathil, Jens Wickert, and Florian Zus

Abstract. This study evaluates the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, with and without WRFDA 3D-VAR data assimilation (DA), for precipitation and temperature forecasts in Luxembourg and the Greater Region during the July 2021 flood event. Conventional observations (CONV), Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Zenith Total Delay (ZTD), and their combination (CONV + ZTD) were assimilated using a 6-hour rapid-update cycle over a full month (20 June–20 July 2021), and verified against independent surface stations withheld from the assimilation, together with radar and GPM IMERG data. For precipitation, DA improved categorical skill: CONV yielded the largest gains in bias (+37.4 %) and probability of detection (+18.3 %), at the cost of a higher false alarm ratio, while CONV + ZTD gave more moderate but balanced improvements. Absolute-error metrics (RMSE, MAE, SMAPE) changed little and mostly not significantly, indicating that DA improves event detection rather than magnitude. For temperature, all configurations reduced bias, ZTD being the most effective (+97.4 %). Station-level Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirm that the bias and detection gains are statistically significant (p < 0.001). The results demonstrate the complementary roles of conventional and GNSS-based observations for regional numerical weather prediction.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Haseeb ur Rehman, Felicia Norma Rebecca Teferle, Addisu Hunegnaw, Rohith Muraleedharan Thundathil, Jens Wickert, and Florian Zus

Status: open (until 10 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Haseeb ur Rehman, Felicia Norma Rebecca Teferle, Addisu Hunegnaw, Rohith Muraleedharan Thundathil, Jens Wickert, and Florian Zus
Haseeb ur Rehman, Felicia Norma Rebecca Teferle, Addisu Hunegnaw, Rohith Muraleedharan Thundathil, Jens Wickert, and Florian Zus
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 30 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates how combining weather models with satellite navigation and meteorological data improves forecasts for extreme events, using the historic July 2021 European floods as a test case. We show that while assimilation significantly boosts our ability to detect rainfall and corrects near-surface temperature errors by up to 97 %, it does not necessarily improve the prediction of rainfall intensity. This has key implications for designing better regional flood warning systems.
Share