Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4208
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4208
21 Aug 2026
 | 21 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscience Communication (GC).

Knowing the ocean: an epistemological and communication framework for Physical Oceanography

Alvise Benetazzo and Tiziano Minuzzo

Abstract. Physical Oceanography is the branch of marine sciences concerned with understanding the oceans as a geophysical fluid system, focusing on the processes that govern the spatial organisation and temporal variability of momentum, heat, and mass across a wide range of scales. Knowledge in Physical Oceanography is produced through a combination of observations, theory, numerical models, and statistical inference; yet its epistemological structure remains largely implicit. This paper develops a framework to clarify how such knowledge is generated, validated, and constrained by the ocean’s vast spatial extent, continuous variability, and multiscale dynamics. We propose a two-dimensional epistemic map that classifies knowledge claims by their aim and representational form, providing a structured vocabulary for interpreting the diversity of oceanographic research. We illustrate the map with an exploratory classification of scientific synopses, and use it to read recent tendencies in the discipline. We further examine the epistemic status of oceanic numerical models and reanalysis systems, and present a case study of wind-wave spectral representation that exposes the underlying assumptions and limits of common practices. Building on these elements, we propose a diagnostic reporting template aimed at making explicit the assumptions, validation criteria, and epistemic payoff of individual studies. By rendering the epistemic structure of a result legible, the framework supports clearer interpretation, comparison, and communication of physical-oceanographic knowledge, both within the discipline and across the wider Earth-system sciences.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Alvise Benetazzo and Tiziano Minuzzo

Status: open (until 16 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Alvise Benetazzo and Tiziano Minuzzo
Alvise Benetazzo and Tiziano Minuzzo
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 21 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Physical oceanographers build knowledge from measurements, theory, and models, yet how this knowledge forms and is judged is rarely explicit. This paper offers a simple framework for classifying scientific claims by what they aim to show and how they are supported. Applied to real studies, including how ocean waves are represented, it reveals hidden assumptions. The result is a practical checklist researchers can use to state evidence and limits, helping scientists trust each other's work.
Share