Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4201
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4201
27 Jul 2026
 | 27 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Storage and connectivity across river corridor and watershed scales in three headwater streams of the southeastern USA

Delaney M. Peterson, C. Nathan Jones, Stephen Plont, Sarah E. Godsey, Kaci Zarek, Adam S. Ward, and Carla L. Atkinson

Abstract. Watershed characteristics create a mosaic of potential storage zones, and linkages between these result in hydrologic connectivity between groundwaters and surface waters. Watershed storage and connectivity are fundamental controls on stream network dynamics, yet predicting the patterns of hydrologic responses like streamflow remains difficult due to landscape heterogeneity across multiple, interacting spatial scales. Here, we characterize storage and connectivity dynamics at the watershed scale and the hydrogeomorphic feature (HGF) scale using a network of steam and riparian groundwater monitoring wells in three watersheds spanning the Coastal Plain, Piedmont, and Appalachian Plateaus physiographic regions of the southeastern USA. At the watershed scale, we operationalized watershed storage as the slope of streamflow recession at the watershed outlet, and hydrologic connectivity as the relationship between outlet discharge and network length. At the HGF scale, we operationalized storage as the slope of water level recession at seven in-stream monitoring locations, and connectivity as the lateral hydraulic gradient and water level hysteresis relationships between the stream channel and adjacent riparian zone at three locations per watershed. At the watershed scale, we found patterns in storage and connectivity varied across physiographic regions. We also found distinct storage and connectivity dynamics across HGFs, many of which challenged existing conceptualizations for similar geomorphic settings. Notably, channel incision emerged as a key structural control, homogenizing storage and connectivity patterns across otherwise disparate watersheds and producing a common threshold response in watershed storage. Together, these results demonstrate that watershed-scale patterns do not reflect the heterogeneity observed at the HGF scale. Moreover, river corridor structure, particularly channel incision, is a key driver of storage and connectivity dynamics across physiographic settings.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Delaney M. Peterson, C. Nathan Jones, Stephen Plont, Sarah E. Godsey, Kaci Zarek, Adam S. Ward, and Carla L. Atkinson

Status: open (until 07 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Delaney M. Peterson, C. Nathan Jones, Stephen Plont, Sarah E. Godsey, Kaci Zarek, Adam S. Ward, and Carla L. Atkinson
Delaney M. Peterson, C. Nathan Jones, Stephen Plont, Sarah E. Godsey, Kaci Zarek, Adam S. Ward, and Carla L. Atkinson
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 27 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
How much watersheds can store and how that water moves between stores are key controls on flow in streams. We measured both at coarse and fine spatial scales in 3 watersheds and found patterns at larger scales often contradicted fine-scale patterns in storage and flows. We also found that characteristics like stream downcutting created similar patterns in storage and flows across watersheds, emphasizing that differences in watershed characteristics are important for water moving through streams.
Share