the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
ENSO simulation in the coupled Korean Integrated Model
Abstract. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) simulation characteristics in the newly established coupled Korea Integrated Model (coupled KIM), which is designed for extended-range prediction. To robustly diagnose ENSO behavior, a 171-year coupled simulation was conducted and systematically evaluated against eight CMIP6 models that share the Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) as their oceanic component. Benchmarking the CLIVAR 2020 ENSO metrics framework, we evaluate diverse aspects of ENSO, including its spatial pattern, intensity, skewness, seasonality, and teleconnections, within the context of the tropical Pacific mean state. The coupled KIM exhibits moderate to above-average performance across most key metrics. Notably, the model successfully mitigates the common systematic bias of an excessive westward extension of the ENSO sea surface temperature (SST) pattern. This improvement is linked to a warmer eastern Pacific mean state compared to other CMIP6 models. However, this warm bias leads to a weak zonal SST gradient and a relatively deeper-than-normal thermocline, which consequently underestimates the overall ENSO intensity. Furthermore, this eastern Pacific warm bias undergoes pronounced seasonal expansion during January–February, intimately synchronized with an amplified double ITCZ bias. This seasonal coupling further flattens the simulated ENSO seasonality, although the ratio of ENSO amplitude between winter and spring remains one of the most realistic among the evaluated models. The model also demonstrates outstanding skill in reproducing ENSO skewness, which is plausibly attributed to recent advancements in the vertical mixing processes of the NEMO component. Additionally, the coupled KIM realistically captures tropical precipitation anomalies and their teleconnection patterns, including the extratropical atmospheric responses in the Northern Hemisphere. These findings validate the current developmental trajectory of the coupled KIM and highlight its robust potential for reliable extended-range forecasting.
- Preprint
(1738 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 04 Oct 2026)
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4120', Juan Antonio Añel, 12 Aug 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Sae-Rim Yeo, 13 Aug 2026
reply
Dear Dr. Añel,
Thank you for your comment and for pointing out the issues regarding compliance with GMD's Code and Data Policy.We sincerely apologise for not having met the policy requirements at the time of submission, and we fully accept the need to correct this before the review process can proceed.We are currently preparing to deposit the data associated with our manuscript in Zenodo, and we would like to ask for your guidance on one practical point before proceeding.The data consist of output from a long-term simulation performed with the Korea Integrated Model (KIM) at 0.5° horizontal resolution.Depositing the complete set of monthly files covering the period 1952–1990 would amount to approximately 115 GB. This exceeds Zenodo's standard limit of 50 GB per record.We would therefore like to ask whether it would be acceptable to deposit a reduced archive containing only the variables that are directly used in the analysis presented in the manuscript, namely tos, tauu, zg, and pr, extracted from the original output. This would allow reviewers and readers to reproduce all figures and results reported in the paper.
If this approach is acceptable to you, we will prepare the archive without delay, obtain a DOI for the deposited data, and post the link and permanent identifier in this discussion as soon as it is available. We are committed to resolving this matter quickly so that the review process can proceed smoothly. We would be grateful for your advice on this point, and we remain happy to follow any alternative arrangement you consider more appropriate.
Yours sincerely,
Sae-Rim Yeo
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4120-AC1 -
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 13 Aug 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Many thanks for your reply. Actually, you should deposit only the variables used in your study. So your proposed solution for sharing the data is correct.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4120-CEC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Sae-Rim Yeo, 14 Aug 2026
reply
Dear Dr. Añel,
Thank you for your careful assessment of our manuscript and for clearly setting out the requirements of GMD's Code and Data Policy.
Following your instruction, we have deposited the processed model output used in this study together with the analysis scripts that generate all figures in the manuscript.
The archive is publicly available at Zenodo under the following DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21927687
We have also revised the description of all third-party datasets used in the study. The generic portal links have been replaced with the persistent DOI of each dataset,
and the corresponding dataset citations have been added to the bibliography.
For the CMIP6 output, we now cite the persistent DataCite DOI of each individual model, experiment, and variant in Table 1 rather than referring to the ESGF search portal.The revised text of the 'Code and Data Availability' section reads as follows:
The full source code of the Korean Integrated Model (KIM) is not publicly available due to institutional restrictions related to the development and maintenance of the operational numerical weather prediction system. The processed KIM simulation output and analysis scripts presented in this study are archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21927687 (Yeo et al., 2026). ERA5 monthly averaged data on pressure levels and on single levels were obtained from the Copernicus Climate Data Store (Hersbach et al., 2023a, https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.6860a573; Hersbach et al., 2023b, https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.f17050d7); the ERA5 system is documented in Hersbach et al. (2020). ORAS5 global ocean reanalysis data were obtained from the Copernicus Climate Data Store (Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2021, https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.67e8eeb7); the system is documented in Zuo et al. (2019). NOAA Optimum Interpolation Sea Surface Temperature version 2.1 is available at https://doi.org/10.25921/RE9P-PT57 (Huang et al., 2021). The Global Precipitation Climatology Project monthly precipitation dataset version 2.3 is available at https://doi.org/10.7289/V56971M6 (Adler et al., 2018). NCEP/DOE Reanalysis 2 is available from the NCAR Research Data Archive at https://doi.org/10.5065/KVQZ-YJ93 (NCEP/NWS/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce, 2000); the system is documented in Kanamitsu et al. (2002). The CMIP6 model output used in this study is archived in the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF). The persistent DataCite DOI of each model, experiment, and variant used is listed individually in Table 1, and each DOI resolves directly to the corresponding ESGF dataset landing page.
We would be grateful if you could confirm whether this revised statement meets the requirements of the policy.
In regard to the documentation of the resctiction on the KIM source code,
We fully understand the need to provide documentary evidence of the institutional restriction rather than a general statement.
KIM is the operational global numerical weather prediction system of the Korea Meteorological Administration, and its source code is subject to restrictions arising from the operational status of the system.
We are currently consulting the responsible offices within the Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems to identify the applicable regulation and to obtain a formal statement that can be provided to the editorial office.
As this requires internal review and authorisation, it will take some time to complete. We would therefore like to ask whether you could allow us additional time to prepare this documentation.
We appreciate your patience and your guidance on these matters, and we are committed to bringing the manuscript into full compliance with the journal's policy as quickly as possible.Yours sincerely,
Sae-Rim Yeo, on behalf of all co-authors
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4120-AC2 -
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 14 Aug 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Many thanks for moving towards the compliance of your manuscript with the policy of the journal. Unfortunately, your proposed solution for the archival of the third-party data used in your study does not solve the situation. Having a permanent identifier for the datasets is only one of the three conditions mentioned in the first comment on this matter. The sites need to have a published data policy and ensure long-term archival. The sites that you continue to link (Copernicus services, NOAA, NCAR, etc.) do not comply with the mentioned requirements, and therefore you need to store the specific data that you have used in a permanent repository.
Please, let us know as soon as you have evidence that you are not allowed to publish the KIM code so that we can assess an exception to the policy.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4120-CEC3 -
AC3: 'Reply on CEC3', Sae-Rim Yeo, 20 Aug 2026
reply
Dear Dr. Añel,
We thank you for the clarification regarding the three conditions required of a data repository. In response, we have deposited all third-party data used in this study in our Zenodo record, and we write now to report this step while the remaining item concerning the KIM source code is still in progress.
Third-party data. The following datasets, subset to the variables, regions, and periods actually used to produce the figures in the manuscript, have been uploaded to the Zenodo record at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22003893 (Yeo et al., 2026). In addition, we have deposited the atmospheric, oceanic, and sea-ice initial conditions used to launch the coupled integration, which were derived from ERA5 and ORAS5.
The record now therefore contains the processed KIM output, the initial conditions, the third-party reference datasets, and the NCL and Python scripts that generate each figure. The file description in the record has been updated accordingly, and the Code and Data Availability section of the revised manuscript will cite the Zenodo archive as the authoritative source for these data, with the original provider DOIs retained only as provenance information and attribution, as required by the licence terms of each provider.
CMIP6 model output. As agreed in our previous exchange, the CMIP6 data remain in the Earth System Grid Federation, and Table 1 of the revised manuscript lists the persistent DataCite DOI of every model, experiment, and variant used, each resolving directly to the corresponding ESGF dataset landing page.
KIM source code. We have formally requested from our institute the documentation attesting to the restrictions on the public release of the KIM source code. This request is currently being processed through the internal administrative procedure. We are submitting the present reply now so that the compliance assessment of the data component is not delayed, and we will follow up with a separate communication as soon as the documentation is available. We hope these measures address the concerns raised, and we remain available for any further clarification.Sincerely,
Sae-Rim Yeo on behalf of all co-authorsCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4120-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on CEC3', Sae-Rim Yeo, 20 Aug 2026
reply
-
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 14 Aug 2026
reply
-
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Sae-Rim Yeo, 14 Aug 2026
reply
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 13 Aug 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Sae-Rim Yeo, 13 Aug 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64 | 16 | 4 | 84 | 3 | 3 |
- HTML: 64
- PDF: 16
- XML: 4
- Total: 84
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
First, it is not clear what prevents you of publishing the code of the KIM. You state in your manuscript "due to institutional restrictions." We can accept this and grant you an exception to the obligation of providing an open repository for the KIM, but you must handle us evidence of the mentioned institutional restrictions. This can be for example a law, rule, official mandate, or license.
Second, you state in your manuscript that the "output and analysis scripts presented in this study will be made publicly available upon the reviewer’s request." We can not accept this. You must publish in a repository openly all the data used and produced in your work, and all the code necessary. The policy of the journal obligates you to do it before submitting a manuscript for consideration for publication.
Also to access several datasets used in your work you cite web sites from NCAR, NOAA, the Copernicus Data Store; however, those sites do not fulfil GMD’s requirements for a persistent data archive because:
- They do not appear to have a published policy for data preservation over many years or decades (some flexibility exists over the precise length of preservation, but the policy must exist).
- They do not appear to have a published mechanism for preventing authors from unilaterally removing material. Archives must have a policy which makes removal of materials only possible in exceptional circumstances and subject to an independent curatorial decision.
What we can accept is the ESGF; however, you must provide a clear link to the specific data used, not a generic one to the main data portal.
Regarding the mentioned sites, if we have missed a published policy which does in fact address this matter satisfactorily, please post a response linking to it. If you have any questions about this issue, please post them in a reply.
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, publish your code and data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy.
Later, if the Topical Editor decides to continue with the review or publication process of your manuscript and you are requested to upload a new version of it, then The 'Code and Data Availability’ section of your manuscript must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor