the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Modeling mineral dust aerosols in the Arctic with the regional model WRF-Chem 4.6.1
Abstract. Important sources of mineral dust aerosols in the high latitudes, especially in the Arctic, are neglected in most atmospheric models. Here, we create a new description of mineral dust aerosol emissions including high-latitude dust sources, and implement it in a polar version of the WRF-Chem 4.6.1 model. We also improve the representation of mineral dust aerosol deposition processes. A 1-year-long quasi-hemispheric simulation for 2012 is evaluated against observations of surface concentrations and deposition fluxes at the Arctic surface. The updated model predicts 34 Tg yr-1 of emissions north of 60° N, and our evaluation shows dramatic improvements in model performance compared to the base model, to a state-of-the-art climate model, and to the CAMS reanalysis. We find that high latitude dust sources have significant impacts on several climate-relevant metrics in the Arctic, such as aerosol optical depth, ice nucleating particle concentrations, and especially mineral dust aerosol deposition to snow and ice, where high latitude sources are the main contributor over the Arctic sea ice pack. These results demonstrate the importance of taking high latitude dust emissions into account, provide a description of these sources reusable in other models, and open the way for future work to better estimate the climate impacts of high latitude dust sources.
- Preprint
(4201 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 16 Sep 2026)
- CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4112', Daniel Bellamy, 22 Jul 2026 reply
-
CC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4112', Alexander Ukhov, 26 Jul 2026
reply
1. Wet scavenging
The manuscript states that GOCART does not include grid-scale wet scavenging. However, standard WRF-Chem provides the large-scale wet-deposition option wetscav_onoff = -1 in module_wetdep_ls.F. Please clarify how the new formulation differs from this existing option and, if possible, briefly compare their performance.
2. Sedimentation mass conservation
Section 4.2 introduces an anti-diffusive sedimentation scheme, but the manuscript does not explicitly demonstrate aerosol mass conservation.
Please provide a mass-budget test confirming that atmospheric aerosol loss through sedimentation is balanced by surface deposition.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4112-CC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | 35 | 11 | 148 | 13 | 13 |
- HTML: 102
- PDF: 35
- XML: 11
- Total: 148
- BibTeX: 13
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
L358: Bellamy et al. (2026) simulates dust events in Canada, not Alaska