Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4112
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4112
21 Jul 2026
 | 21 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Modeling mineral dust aerosols in the Arctic with the regional model WRF-Chem 4.6.1

Louis Marelle, Rémy Lapere, Anderson Da Silva, Lucas Bastien, Ruth Price, and Jennie L. Thomas

Abstract. Important sources of mineral dust aerosols in the high latitudes, especially in the Arctic, are neglected in most atmospheric models. Here, we create a new description of mineral dust aerosol emissions including high-latitude dust sources, and implement it in a polar version of the WRF-Chem 4.6.1 model. We also improve the representation of mineral dust aerosol deposition processes. A 1-year-long quasi-hemispheric simulation for 2012 is evaluated against observations of surface concentrations and deposition fluxes at the Arctic surface. The updated model predicts 34 Tg yr-1 of emissions north of 60° N, and our evaluation shows dramatic improvements in model performance compared to the base model, to a state-of-the-art climate model, and to the CAMS reanalysis. We find that high latitude dust sources have significant impacts on several climate-relevant metrics in the Arctic, such as aerosol optical depth, ice nucleating particle concentrations, and especially mineral dust aerosol deposition to snow and ice, where high latitude sources are the main contributor over the Arctic sea ice pack. These results demonstrate the importance of taking high latitude dust emissions into account, provide a description of these sources reusable in other models, and open the way for future work to better estimate the climate impacts of high latitude dust sources.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Louis Marelle, Rémy Lapere, Anderson Da Silva, Lucas Bastien, Ruth Price, and Jennie L. Thomas

Status: open (until 16 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Louis Marelle, Rémy Lapere, Anderson Da Silva, Lucas Bastien, Ruth Price, and Jennie L. Thomas
Louis Marelle, Rémy Lapere, Anderson Da Silva, Lucas Bastien, Ruth Price, and Jennie L. Thomas
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 22 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Airborne mineral dust particles influence the climate, but their sources near the poles are poorly understood. We create a new description of dust sources for numerical atmospheric models, and show that it dramatically improves the representation of atmospheric concentrations and deposition to the surface in the Arctic. Finally, we show that these sources have the potential to influence the Arctic energy budget, and that the new model can be used to investigate these impacts in detail.
Share