Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4029
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4029
27 Jul 2026
 | 27 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Linking moss cover, soil organic matter fractions, and carbon stabilization pathways in temperate forest ecosystems

Madhavi Parajuli, Rabindra Adhikari, Xiaoxia Yang, Luisa Brosch, Nadja Fürst, Thomas Scholten, Steffen Seitz, and Corinna Gall

Abstract. Moss cover is increasingly recognized as a biotic driver of soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics in forest ecosystems, yet its influence on C stabilization across functionally distinct soil organic matter (SOM) fractions remains poorly quantified. How moss cover interacts with forest type and parent material to regulate C partitioning into mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM), the most persistent SOC fraction, is largely unknown in temperate forests. To address this gap, we investigated SOC distribution among free particulate organic matter (fPOM), occluded POM (oPOM), and MAOM across moss-covered and no moss soils in two contrasting temperate forest types differing in parent material. A total of 42 topsoil samples (0–2 cm) were collected from a coniferous mixed forest on sandstone and loess parent materials (Baden-Württemberg) and a pine forest on sandy parent material (Brandenburg). Physical density fractionation was applied to resolve SOM fraction distribution, and total nitrogen (TN) and C:N ratios were determined alongside carbon stabilization efficiency (CSE), calculated as mineral-associated organic matter carbon (MAOM-C) / SOC × 100, as an integrative index of stabilization capacity.

Moss-covered soils showed significantly higher SOC and TN concentrations than no moss soils, with the strongest effects observed in the coniferous mixed forest on sandstone parent material and negligible in loess. MAOM-C concentrations significantly increased under moss cover in the coniferous mixed–sandstone environment where CSE nearly doubled compared to no moss soils. Biotic factors, in particular the interaction between moss cover and forest type, were the primary predictors of stable C, while parent material exerted no independent effect. These results demonstrate that moss cover is linked to distinct C stabilization pathways, favoring mineral-associated stabilization in coniferous mixed forests and accumulation of labile C fractions in pine forests, underscoring the importance of incorporating moss cover as a biotic driver in SOC models and temperate forest C accounting frameworks.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Madhavi Parajuli, Rabindra Adhikari, Xiaoxia Yang, Luisa Brosch, Nadja Fürst, Thomas Scholten, Steffen Seitz, and Corinna Gall

Status: open (until 07 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Madhavi Parajuli, Rabindra Adhikari, Xiaoxia Yang, Luisa Brosch, Nadja Fürst, Thomas Scholten, Steffen Seitz, and Corinna Gall
Madhavi Parajuli, Rabindra Adhikari, Xiaoxia Yang, Luisa Brosch, Nadja Fürst, Thomas Scholten, Steffen Seitz, and Corinna Gall
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 27 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
We studied how moss growing on forest soils influences long-term carbon storage in two temperate forests in Germany. By separating soil into different organic matter components, we found that moss can increase the amount of carbon held in the most stable form, especially in coniferous forests. These findings show that moss plays an important role in helping forests store carbon and should be considered in forest carbon assessments and climate change research.
Share