the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Measurement report: Geostationary satellite and ground-based video observations of cloud brightness variations triggered by the 2022 Hunga Lamb wave
Abstract. The eruption of the Hunga volcano on 15 January 2022 generated a Lamb wave, an atmospheric pressure perturbation propagating horizontally at the speed of sound. A recent regional study uncovered variations in the reflectance of liquid clouds triggered by the wave’s temperature perturbations, most notably a transient darkening during the first minor-arc wave passage across the Caribbean. The present expanded analysis—combining ground-based video footage, surface pressure records, and geostationary satellite imagery—reveals that the Lamb wave-induced cloud reflectance variations were globally detectable for ~6 days. Reflectance anomalies traced temperature anomalies on timescales as short as a few seconds to 1 min and persisted at the 2 % level even after 3 days of propagation. The relative magnitudes of cloud darkening and brightening changed upon each crossing of the antipode or the epicenter due to the caustic phase shift. Brightening dominated during the second minor-arc wave passage because of a polarity inversion. The observed lifetime of the Lamb wave compares well with early theoretical estimates.
- Preprint
(16865 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
- RC1: 'Comment on manuscript by Horváth et al. (egusphere-2026-3997)', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Aug 2026 reply
Data sets
NOAA GOES-R Series Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Level 1 Data NOAA https://registry.opendata.aws/noaa-goes/
High Rate SEVIRI Level 1.5 Image Data - MSG - 0 degree EUMETSAT https://user.eumetsat.int/catalogue/EO:EUM:DAT:MSG:HRSEVIRI
Geo-KOMPSAT-2A (GK2A) Advanced Meteorological Imager (AMI) Meteorological Satellite Data Korea Meteorological Administration https://data.kma.go.kr/data/rmt/rmtList.do?code=21&pgmNo=683
National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) ASOS https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/data/automated-surface-observing-system-one-minute-pg2/
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 104 | 77 | 19 | 200 | 16 | 11 |
- HTML: 104
- PDF: 77
- XML: 19
- Total: 200
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
In a single sentence, the manuscript provides a thorough characterization of the atmospheric waves that kept circling the Earth for a few days after an unusually powerful volcano eruption.
I found the paper not only informative, scientifically sound and valuable, but, at parts, outright fascinating to read. I appreciated the well-presented results and the clear explanations, and even the highly relevant and helpful YouTube videos referenced in the paper.
A key strength of the study is its comprehensive, integrated approach: It combines observations from multiple sources (ranging from ground-based cameras and barometers to imagers on multiple satellites) and examines multiple effects of the atmospheric waves (their impacts on atmospheric pressure, and on the reflectance and brightness temperature of clouds). It also includes clear and reasonable physical explanations for the observed behaviors.
While I have a high opinion of the manuscript and I believe it is worthy of publication, I still recommend a few minor refinements. Please find my specific comments below.
Line 90: It would be helpful to explain in a few words what minor arc and major arc passages are (e.g., waves reaching a point along the short or the long way, covering less than or more than 180°, etc.).
Line 103: I recommend deleting the comma after “method”.
Line 111: It would help to explain briefly how exactly the frequency of a Lamb wave is calculated. Is it perhaps 1 over the time difference between the two minimums (before and after the main peak) in Figure 2, or is it something else?
Line 289: I recommend inserting the word “white” in front of “arrow”, as the arrow in the figure is white (and not black, as the illustration in Line 289 suggests).
Figure 3: The times after 05:07 UTC mentioned in the caption don’t appear in the figure. Perhaps some figure panels are missing, or some time values are mistaken? Also, it would help to change the color and/or the pattern for two of the three ovals that are shown with a dotted red line (1st and 2nd peaks and recovery), just to avoid confusion and to make the identification easier. For example, using green or orange colors and/or using dashed lines could work. (Of course, the main text should be updated accordingly, for example in Line 337.)
Lines 964-965: Clicking on the links to the supplements does not seem to work for me.