Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3936
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3936
31 Jul 2026
 | 31 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Climate of the Past (CP).

Automated Homogenisation of Early Instrumental Temperature Data at the Global Scale Using the HCLIM Dataset

Elin Lundstad, Andreas Dobler, Michael Taylor, and Magnus Joelsson

Abstract. Early instrumental observations provide a unique opportunity to investigate climate variability before the establishment of modern meteorological networks. However, their effective use is often hindered by incomplete records, uneven spatial coverage, and non-climatic inhomogeneities. The HCLIM dataset provides a recently compiled global collection of early instrumental temperature records, yet systematic evaluations of automated homogenisation methods for such data remain limited. Here, we evaluate three widely used homogenisation methods, CLIMATOL, PHA, and BART, applied to the HCLIM dataset. The assessment considers data retention following pre-processing, breakpoint detection in the homogenised series, and agreement with the Twentieth Century Reanalysis version 3 (20CRv3), using French and Southeast Asian station networks as representative case studies. The pre-processed datasets differ only modestly in overall structure, although BART retains fewer records (80 %) than CLIMATOL (96 %) and PHA (99 %) because of its stricter requirement for a minimum record length of 15 consecutive years. Consequently, BART preserves longer average record lengths and detects substantially more breakpoints, indicating greater sensitivity to potential inhomogeneities. Breakpoint occurrence varies considerably across regions and time periods, reflecting differences in station density and observational coverage. Comparisons with 20CRv3 show generally high agreement for all methods, with stronger consistency in the dense French network than in the sparser Southeast Asian network. Despite differences in data retention, breakpoint detection, and adjustment strategy, the homogenised datasets show strong agreement with one another and preserve the principal climatic signal. Notably, differences among the homogenisation methods are consistently smaller than the differences between the original and homogenised datasets, indicating that the primary challenge is not selecting a single optimal algorithm but reconstructing temporally coherent climate information from incomplete historical observations. The homogenised datasets produced in this study constitute HOM-HCLIM, a new global database of homogenised early instrumental temperature records that provides an important resource for climate reconstruction, reanalysis, and long-term climate variability studies.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Elin Lundstad, Andreas Dobler, Michael Taylor, and Magnus Joelsson

Status: open (until 25 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Elin Lundstad, Andreas Dobler, Michael Taylor, and Magnus Joelsson
Elin Lundstad, Andreas Dobler, Michael Taylor, and Magnus Joelsson
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 31 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Early weather records help us understand how climate has changed over the past centuries, but many contain gaps and inconsistencies. We compared three automated methods for improving these records using a global collection of historical temperature observations. Although the methods differed in how they treated incomplete data, all successfully recovered the main climate signal. The results provide a stronger foundation for reconstructing past climate and improving future climate research.
Share