A globally scalable, light data framework for flood-hazard mapping using open geospatial services
Abstract. Flood-risk screening is often limited by the lack of globally consistent hazard layers, because detailed hydraulic models require local calibration, boundary conditions, and substantial computation. This study presents a light data framework that uses application programming interfaces to assemble global elevation, hydrography, and road-network data for flood-hazard susceptibility mapping. Height Above Nearest Drainage is derived with drainage calibration constrained by OpenStreetMap hydrography, while the Multiresolution Index of Valley-Bottom Flatness adds complementary information on valley planarity. An interpretable monotonic gradient-boosted regression model is trained on return-period inundation inventories and converted into a common five-class ordinal hazard scale using threshold sets suited to planar and incised river settings. Applications to three independent river reaches show that the upper hazard classes consistently capture the 100-year flood footprint. The ordinal ranking remains physically coherent across return periods: low-susceptibility terrain is largely insensitive to increasing flood severity, whereas higher classes show progressively greater inundation likelihood. The model distinguishes flooded from non-flooded terrain in 78–83 % of pairwise comparisons and remains effective under strict false-alarm constraints. The framework delivers screening-grade hazard layers for prioritisation and for integration with exposure and vulnerability analyses. Future work should test broader climatic and geomorphic settings and refine transferability across regions.
Overall
The paper builds an automated workflow that downloads a 30 m DEM and OpenStreetMap rivers, computes HAND, MRVBF and 14 derived variables, fits a gradient-boosted model to Metroplan return-period flood maps, and cuts the score into five "hazard" classes. It is trained on two reaches and tested on three others, with AUC of 0.784–0.827 (Table 6). Open data and code are welcome, but the problems are in the foundations, not the details. The premise ignores existing global flood hazard layers. The five classes are quantile ranks within the study window and have no fixed meaning. The drainage calibration, presented as the first methodological contribution, favours a network reduced to the main stem. The model learns from two reaches, and all testing uses maps of one agency in one region, while the title claims global scalability. These issues cannot be fixed by revision, and I recommend rejection.
Major comments
References mentioned in this report