the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Seasonal variability in methane emissions from the Yangtze River Delta revealed by a high-resolution atmospheric inversion
Abstract. Accurate methane (CH4) emission estimates are essential for attributing regional CH4 sources and quantifying their spatial and temporal variability, particularly in high-emission regions of China under stringent mitigation policies. Here, we apply CTDAS-WRF, a regional inversion framework that couples the CarbonTracker Data Assimilation Shell (CTDAS) with WRF-Chem, to quantify CH4 emissions over East Asia. Through Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs), we find that the system can recover ~61 % of the imposed prior-to-truth adjustment in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), 68 % in South Korea, and 93 % in northern Japan, indicating good performance in observation-rich regions. Using a composite prior for anthropogenic emissions based on EDGAR_2024 and CAMS v6.2, the 2022 inversion yields total posterior emissions of 7.530.09 Tg yr-1 in the YRD, which is 11.0 % lower than the prior (8.46 Tg yr-1). Prior anthropogenic emissions are overestimated by 12.7 % (0.9 Tg yr-1), while prior natural emissions are also higher by 0.03 Tg yr-1. Daily posterior emissions exhibit a much stronger seasonal cycle and peak in summer, with natural sources and rice cultivation dominating the summertime underestimate in the prior. Independent evaluation at in situ station further supports the posterior improvement, with the daily mean absolute error reduced by 3.4 ppb (11.0 %) relative to the prior simulation. This work highlights the importance of accounting for seasonal variability in YRD emissions and provides a basis for future inversions that integrate in situ and satellite observations to better constrain the CH4 budget of East Asia.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(3902 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1500 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3879', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Aug 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-3879/egusphere-2026-3879-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-3879-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Mengrong Lu, 19 Oct 2026
Dear Editor and Referees,
We thank both referees for their constructive and detailed comments. Our point-by-point responses to Referee #1 (RC1) and Referee #2 (RC2) are provided in the attached PDF, and the corresponding changes are indicated in the revised manuscript. This response is posted on behalf of all co-authors.
Best regards,
Mengrong Lu -
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Mengrong Lu, 25 Oct 2026
Dear Editor and Referees,
We have re-uploaded our point-by-point responses to Referee #1 (RC1) and Referee #2 (RC2) in the attached PDF. This version updates the line numbers and includes minor formatting adjustments, and it supersedes the previously posted one. The content of our responses is unchanged.
This response is posted on behalf of all co-authors.
Best regards,
Mengrong Lu
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Mengrong Lu, 19 Oct 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3879', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Sep 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-3879/egusphere-2026-3879-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mengrong Lu, 19 Oct 2026
Dear Editor and Referees,
We thank both referees for their constructive and detailed comments. Our point-by-point responses to Referee #1 (RC1) and Referee #2 (RC2) are provided in the attached PDF, and the corresponding changes are indicated in the revised manuscript. This response is posted on behalf of all co-authors.
Best regards,
Mengrong Lu -
AC4: 'Reply on RC2', Mengrong Lu, 25 Oct 2026
Dear Editor and Referees,
We have re-uploaded our point-by-point responses to Referee #1 (RC1) and Referee #2 (RC2) in the attached PDF. This version updates the line numbers and includes minor formatting adjustments, and it supersedes the previously posted one. The content of our responses is unchanged.
This response is posted on behalf of all co-authors.
Best regards,
Mengrong Lu
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mengrong Lu, 19 Oct 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 382 | 182 | 51 | 615 | 114 | 46 | 50 |
- HTML: 382
- PDF: 182
- XML: 51
- Total: 615
- Supplement: 114
- BibTeX: 46
- EndNote: 50
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1