Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3879
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3879
27 Jul 2026
 | 27 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Seasonal variability in methane emissions from the Yangtze River Delta revealed by a high-resolution atmospheric inversion

Mengrong Lu, Huilin Chen, Xun Zhang, Xuguang Chi, Chong Wei, Shuangxi Fang, Fenjuan Wang, Eleftherios Ioannidis, Friedemann Reum, Xinlu Wang, Prajal Pradhan, Wouter Peters, Klaus Hubacek, and Sander Houweling

Abstract. Accurate methane (CH4) emission estimates are essential for attributing regional CH4 sources and quantifying their spatial and temporal variability, particularly in high-emission regions of China under stringent mitigation policies. Here, we apply CTDAS-WRF, a regional inversion framework that couples the CarbonTracker Data Assimilation Shell (CTDAS) with WRF-Chem, to quantify CH4 emissions over East Asia. Through Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs), we find that the system can recover ~61 % of the imposed prior-to-truth adjustment in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), 68 % in South Korea, and 93 % in northern Japan, indicating good performance in observation-rich regions. Using a composite prior for anthropogenic emissions based on EDGAR_2024 and CAMS v6.2, the 2022 inversion yields total posterior emissions of 7.530.09 Tg yr-1 in the YRD, which is 11.0 % lower than the prior (8.46 Tg yr-1). Prior anthropogenic emissions are overestimated by 12.7 % (0.9 Tg yr-1), while prior natural emissions are also higher by 0.03 Tg yr-1. Daily posterior emissions exhibit a much stronger seasonal cycle and peak in summer, with natural sources and rice cultivation dominating the summertime underestimate in the prior. Independent evaluation at in situ station further supports the posterior improvement, with the daily mean absolute error reduced by 3.4 ppb (11.0 %) relative to the prior simulation. This work highlights the importance of accounting for seasonal variability in YRD emissions and provides a basis for future inversions that integrate in situ and satellite observations to better constrain the CH4 budget of East Asia.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Mengrong Lu, Huilin Chen, Xun Zhang, Xuguang Chi, Chong Wei, Shuangxi Fang, Fenjuan Wang, Eleftherios Ioannidis, Friedemann Reum, Xinlu Wang, Prajal Pradhan, Wouter Peters, Klaus Hubacek, and Sander Houweling

Status: open (until 07 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Mengrong Lu, Huilin Chen, Xun Zhang, Xuguang Chi, Chong Wei, Shuangxi Fang, Fenjuan Wang, Eleftherios Ioannidis, Friedemann Reum, Xinlu Wang, Prajal Pradhan, Wouter Peters, Klaus Hubacek, and Sander Houweling
Mengrong Lu, Huilin Chen, Xun Zhang, Xuguang Chi, Chong Wei, Shuangxi Fang, Fenjuan Wang, Eleftherios Ioannidis, Friedemann Reum, Xinlu Wang, Prajal Pradhan, Wouter Peters, Klaus Hubacek, and Sander Houweling
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 27 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Effective methane mitigation requires accurate knowledge of the spatial and temporal distribution of sources and sinks. Using high-resolution atmospheric modeling and ground-based observations, we estimated methane emissions in East Asia, focusing on the Yangtze River Delta. Emissions are lower than most inventories suggest, but show a clear seasonal cycle, with summer peaks driven by rice cultivation and natural sources. This seasonality is critical for emission tracking and mitigation design.
Share